2006
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2006.881592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotor-Related Networks in the Lumbosacral Enlargement of the Adult Spinal Cat: Activation Through Intraspinal Microstimulation

Abstract: It is commonly accepted that locomotor-related neuronal circuitry resides in the lumbosacral spinal cord. Pharmacological agents, epidural electrical stimulation, and sensory stimulation can be used to activate these instrinsic networks in in vitro neonatal rat and in vivo cat preparations. In this study, we investigated the use of low-level tonic intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) as a means of activating spinal locomotor networks in adult cats with complete spinal transections. Trains of low-amplitude elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CPGs resembles recent reports demonstrating the involvement of short projecting propriospinal neurons in the descending control of the pattern generating circuitry (Cowley et al, 2008), their role as alternative communication pathways following traumatic spinal cord injuries (Guevremont et al, 2006;Courtine et al, 2008) and their potential involvement in functional recovery from spinal cord injuries (Yakovenko et al, 2007;Edgerton and Roy, 2009) and in developing neural repair strategies such as microstimulation of selected regions of the spinal cord (for review, see Bizzi et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…CPGs resembles recent reports demonstrating the involvement of short projecting propriospinal neurons in the descending control of the pattern generating circuitry (Cowley et al, 2008), their role as alternative communication pathways following traumatic spinal cord injuries (Guevremont et al, 2006;Courtine et al, 2008) and their potential involvement in functional recovery from spinal cord injuries (Yakovenko et al, 2007;Edgerton and Roy, 2009) and in developing neural repair strategies such as microstimulation of selected regions of the spinal cord (for review, see Bizzi et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…In interpreting the different results it is important to recognize that the L4 spinal level in cats corresponds to the L2 spinal level in humans and rats, i.e., the spinal level most responsive to ES for inducing locomotor-like activity. A plausible explanation for inducing stepping movements in response to ES of the caudal lumbosacral segments may be due to the activation of rostral segments through the projection of propriospinal neurons (Shik, 1997;Guevremont et al, 2006).…”
Section: Site Of Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a, 7a and 9a the an equivalent manner, the results of the paper can be used for the assistance and rehabilitation of the human motion. Indicative results on the use of Central Patterns Generators for coordination of the motion of human joints in limbs or in controlling spinal cord locomotion can be found in Amini et al (2005); Guevremont et al (2006); Noble et al (2011);Simoni and DeWeerth (2006) and Vogelstein et al (2006). The results presented in the previous sections can also find similar application in the assistance and correction of the motor functions of the human body and in the treatment of neurological diseases (e.g.…”
Section: State and Disturbances Estimation With The Derivativefree Nomentioning
confidence: 80%