2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3145-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: a comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI

Abstract: In this initial study, no significant differences were found among (18)F-FDG PET/MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in local tumour staging and cancer recurrence diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
47
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…PET/MR provided more accurate T staging of HN cancer than PET/CT and MRI (75,59, 50 %, respectively), but could not achieve statistical significance. N staging results also showed no significant difference between these modalities [31]. One study reported that PET/MRI increased sensitivity for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis over MRI only (89.5 % vs. 65.8 %, respectively) but there was no significant difference with standalone PET (86.8 %) [32].…”
Section: Head and Neck Cancermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…PET/MR provided more accurate T staging of HN cancer than PET/CT and MRI (75,59, 50 %, respectively), but could not achieve statistical significance. N staging results also showed no significant difference between these modalities [31]. One study reported that PET/MRI increased sensitivity for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis over MRI only (89.5 % vs. 65.8 %, respectively) but there was no significant difference with standalone PET (86.8 %) [32].…”
Section: Head and Neck Cancermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, integrated PET/MRI is expected to allow more accurate local tumor staging as well as lymph node evaluation compared with PET/CT. As most data from the literature have to be considered preliminary, no obvious superiority has been demonstrated until today (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılan bir çalışmada PET/MR görüntülemenin T evrelemede PET/BT'ye üstün olduğu, nodal evrelemede ise iki görüntüleme yönteminin birbirine yakın tanısal performans sergilediği gösterilmiştir (38). Bir başka çalışmada PET/MR'ın PET/ BT ve tek başına MR görüntülemeye göre daha doğru T ve N evrelemesi sağladığı, ama istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadığı belirtilmiştir (39). Tümörün lokal yayılımının değerlendirilmesinde MR görüntüleme BT'ye üstün iken, lenf nodu değerlendirmesinde ise PET'in katkısı daha ön plandadır.…”
Section: Başveboyuntümörlerindepet/mrunclassified