2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lodgepole pine growth as a function of competition and canopy light environment within aspen dominated mixedwoods of central interior British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was expected since plots were chosen across a range of increasing levels of aspen competition and strong negative associations between the two species have been reported previously (Newsome et al 2008, Harper et al 2009). A similar negative growth association has been shown between jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and aspen (Kenkel 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was expected since plots were chosen across a range of increasing levels of aspen competition and strong negative associations between the two species have been reported previously (Newsome et al 2008, Harper et al 2009). A similar negative growth association has been shown between jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and aspen (Kenkel 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Much research has focused on understanding and predicting the response of pine to the range of light environments within aspen-pine mixedwoods (Landhausser and Lieffers 2001, Claveau et al 2005, Harper et al 2009). Research has shown pine height and diameter growth increase in a linear fashion with increases in light availability and, diameter growth has been found to respond to reductions in competition levels more quickly than height growth (MacIsaac and Navratil 1996, Wright et al 1998, Coates 2000, Newsome et al 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overtopping aspen has been shown to influence the growing conditions of understorey trees through impacts on suggest aspen threshold densities exist for unimpeded pine growth appear to contradict generally established principles of forest dynamics where tree growth is inversely related to density (Zeide 2002, Pretzsch 2009). Although total stand productivity may remain unchanged with increased levels of aspen, there is a significant decline in pine component growth and yield (Harper 2015) and several studies have documented diameter growth impacts in young pine (Newsome et al 2008, Harper et al 2009). Most published studies have focused on early establishment performance prior to canopy closure based on measurements of aspen competition in young pine from small plots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%