1974
DOI: 10.2307/2529224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Log-Linear Models for Frequency Tables with Ordered Classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
135
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another popular iterative approach, and one adopted in this paper, is Newton's unidimensional method. Refer to Goodman [3], Haberman [4,10], and Agresti [5] for further details on the method. Here a brief description of Newton's method will be provided although a more detailed account on the algorithm used in this paper is provided in Beh and Farver [9].…”
Section: Mle (Newton's Unidimensional Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another popular iterative approach, and one adopted in this paper, is Newton's unidimensional method. Refer to Goodman [3], Haberman [4,10], and Agresti [5] for further details on the method. Here a brief description of Newton's method will be provided although a more detailed account on the algorithm used in this paper is provided in Beh and Farver [9].…”
Section: Mle (Newton's Unidimensional Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, but are not limited to, the contributions of Goodman [3], Haberman [4], Agresti [5, Appendix B], Nelder and Wedderburn [6], Galindo-Garre and Vermunt [7], and Aït-Sidi-Allal et al [8].…”
Section: The Ordinal Log-linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of this kind have a long history in the literature on log-linear models (Haberman, 1974b) and variations have begun to appear with general diagnostic models (Xu & von Davier, 2007).…”
Section: The Polytomous Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model differs from our baseline specification in equation (3) because Tj, refers to a priori values rather than freely estimated ones.30 We thus end up with a hybrid specification that stands somewhere between the association models of Haberman (1974) and those of Hout (1984). As indicated in equation (14), the row categories in our data are scaled with the standard unit scores of a linear-by-linear interaction model (see Haberman 1974;Duncan 1979;Goodman 1979a), whereas the column categories are scaled with external scores of the kind deployed by Hout (1984Hout ( , 1988, Hauser (1984), and others (Hout and Jackson 1986;SzelCnyi 1988).…”
Section: American Journal Of Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%