2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00270.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Log‐ratio Compositional Data Analysis in Archaeometry*

Abstract: Compositional data arise commonly in archaeometry, in the study of artefact compositions where the variables measured either sum to 100%, or can be viewed as a subset of such a set of variables. There has been debate in Archaeometry about the appropriate way to analyse such data statistically, which amounts to argument about how the data should be transformed prior to statistical analysis. This paper reviews aspects of the debate and illustrates, using both simulated and real data, that what has been proposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
57
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Aitchison, 1986;Baxter and Freestone, 2006;Pawlowsky-Glahn and Egozcue, 2006). It has been widely recognised that compositional data provide relative rather than absolute information and, therefore, the use of ratios rather than pure elemental concentrations is highly recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Aitchison, 1986;Baxter and Freestone, 2006;Pawlowsky-Glahn and Egozcue, 2006). It has been widely recognised that compositional data provide relative rather than absolute information and, therefore, the use of ratios rather than pure elemental concentrations is highly recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, sediment volume is not technically independent of the frequencies of finds, since those finds contribute to the total volume; find-density data are still technically compositional -analogous, perhaps, to trace elements in ceramic or glass compositional analysis. This has troubling implications for multivariate analyses (see Aitchison et al 2002;Baxter and Freestone 2006), but becomes a problem for comparing find deposition rates only when the finds in question make up a substantial percentage of the sediment matrix. Bone find-density data are thus of limited value for comparing taxonomic frequencies in extremely bone-rich contexts such as fish middens or Roman urban 'soup kitchen' deposits.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, archaeologists are consistently interested in the chemical groups that compositional analyses of ceramics suggest. Yet, it is not always clear that the definition of such chemical groups may be dependent on the way compositional data are transformed (Michelaki and Hancock, 2011), on the particular data exploration method selected (Baxter and Freestone, 2006) and even on the specific elements selected for consideration (Baxter and Jackson, 2001). Although some archaeometrists and statisticians consider such dependence obvious, the issue is rarely addressed clearly in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%