2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-016-0517-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Log-symmetric regression models under the presence of non-informative left- or right-censored observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boston crime data were studied by Vanegas and Paula . Medeiros and Ferrari developed a Bartlett‐type correction for these models, whereas Vanegas and Paula analyzed the presence of noninformative left or right censored data. Despite the high density and volatility, high‐frequency financial data were well fitted by a log‐symmetric duration model .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boston crime data were studied by Vanegas and Paula . Medeiros and Ferrari developed a Bartlett‐type correction for these models, whereas Vanegas and Paula analyzed the presence of noninformative left or right censored data. Despite the high density and volatility, high‐frequency financial data were well fitted by a log‐symmetric duration model .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] Log-symmetric regressions provide a solution for describing data when the assumption of normality is not valid. 9 In addition, these regression models allow either the median or skewness of the response variable (response hereafter) to be formulated. Both measures are important when modeling variables with asymmetric distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is quite analogous to the one given in appendix of Vanegas and Paula (2017). Hence, the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix ofθ takes the form…”
Section: Asymptotic Statementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To study the limit behavior of the penalized maximum likelihood estimatorŝ θ under censoring, we adopt the approach of Vanegas and Paula (2017) and the assumptions of regularity given in Bagdonavicius and Nikulin (2001). This approach consists in assuming the number of knots fixed, which means that the penalty matrices and the sizes of γ 1 , · · · , γ k are not functions of the sample size n. Some additional conditions are necessary to guarantee the consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimators, given by…”
Section: Asymptotic Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation