2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logic Based Coordination for Event–Driven Self–healing Distributed Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semantics of Appel [,] which before was only defined informally, as with most policy languages, has been formally defined by translation into the temporal logic ∆DSTL(x) [15,16].…”
Section: An Experiments In Static Conflict Detection For Autonomic Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantics of Appel [,] which before was only defined informally, as with most policy languages, has been formally defined by translation into the temporal logic ∆DSTL(x) [15,16].…”
Section: An Experiments In Static Conflict Detection For Autonomic Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20,21], we take a logic-based approach to this end: conflicts are detected by deducing specific formulae in a suitable theory. A translation function has been defined to derive the logical representation of Appel policies in the temporal logic ∆DSTL(x) [22,23]: as a side effect, this function defines a formal semantics for Appel, which before was only defined informally, like most of the policy languages. The translation maps a group of policies into a logical theory expressing its meaning.…”
Section: Run-time Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Appel has so far only been presented with an informal semantics, we must first formalise this in a suitable logic. This paper presents the novel formal semantics for Appel which is based on ∆DSTL(x) (distributed state temporal logic [14,15]) and then shows how this helps with the rigorous detection of conflicts.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∆DSTL(x) is an extension of temporal logic to deal with global applications: it includes modalities to localize properties to system components, an operator to deal with events, and temporal modalitiesà la Unity [14,15]. For instance, one may say that event ∆q (q becomes true) occurring in component m when property p holds, entails that properties q and r hold in future states of components n and m, respectively: m (p ∧ ∆q) leads to n r ∧ m s.…”
Section: A Fragment Of the Distributed States Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%