2017 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cadiag.2017.8075650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logic gate-based evolutionary algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, large Glover and Kochenberger (GK) instances were solved and compared to eight heuristic algorithms from the literature in terms of average error percent (3) gap against best-known profit (BKS) from the literature. Compared algorithms include ACOwD, IWOA, Two-phase tabuevolutionary algorithm (TPTEA) [35], harmony search based algorithm NBHS2 proposed in [40], evolutionary algorithm with logic gates LGEA [36], shuffled complex evolution algorithm SCEcr [37], hyper-heuristic inspired CF-LAS [72] and BCSA -binary cuckoo search algorithm [41]. Table 3 is colour coded from red (worst average error %) to the best average error percent, in green, for each problem instance with dashes (-) representing scores that were not available.…”
Section: E Comparison To the State-of-the-art Metaheuristics For Mkpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Next, large Glover and Kochenberger (GK) instances were solved and compared to eight heuristic algorithms from the literature in terms of average error percent (3) gap against best-known profit (BKS) from the literature. Compared algorithms include ACOwD, IWOA, Two-phase tabuevolutionary algorithm (TPTEA) [35], harmony search based algorithm NBHS2 proposed in [40], evolutionary algorithm with logic gates LGEA [36], shuffled complex evolution algorithm SCEcr [37], hyper-heuristic inspired CF-LAS [72] and BCSA -binary cuckoo search algorithm [41]. Table 3 is colour coded from red (worst average error %) to the best average error percent, in green, for each problem instance with dashes (-) representing scores that were not available.…”
Section: E Comparison To the State-of-the-art Metaheuristics For Mkpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACOwD [31] NBHS2 [40] IWOA [42] LGEA [36] TPTEA [35] SCEcr [37] CF-LAS [72] BCSA [41] ICAwICA (this work)…”
Section: Problem Size (N X M) Bksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations