2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315723655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logic: The Basics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the interest implies the truth of an issue, given the truth of another issue) . For an introduction to propositional logic, see for instance (Beall 2010, Copi et al . 2011 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the interest implies the truth of an issue, given the truth of another issue) . For an introduction to propositional logic, see for instance (Beall 2010, Copi et al . 2011 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory can be very 'classical' with respect to its key predicates, even though logic itself is subclassical. 6…”
Section: Objection: Too Weak!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not present K3 in full; we present only enough to make sense of the explicit proposal (and some of the objections) canvassed in the paper. Full treatments are available in textbooks on philosophical logic [6,8,17].…”
Section: Closing Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Which role? My answer is the one to which 'Christ -A Contradiction' points: namely, the role of 'universal (via ܴ's equivalence-relation properties) is such an ‫.ݔ‬ QED] For basic details, see Beall and Logan 2017; for more in-depth details, see Priest 2008. 12 My pointing only to McCall's second horn should not be read as my endorsing his argument for the first horn; the soundness of that argument is not clear to me (though this is not in any way a polite implicature to the effect that I think the argument is unsound).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%