1965
DOI: 10.1080/00385417.1965.10770197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logical and Cartographic forms of Regionalization and their Study Objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If A, S, and I in figure 1 were somewhat similar physical properties or slightly different landforms, then many mappers would tend to join the shaded areas (depending on scale) to make them contiguous, which infers that all the area in and between the shaded areas embraces a significantly large group of genetically related covariant attributes. These are the "natural" regions thought of by geographers, and the philosophy of their discrimination has been much discussed (Armand, 1965;Grigg, 1965Grigg, , 1967McDonald, 1966;Rodoman, 1965). Geologic formations are often so regarded~ although the Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature (Am.…”
Section: Units or Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If A, S, and I in figure 1 were somewhat similar physical properties or slightly different landforms, then many mappers would tend to join the shaded areas (depending on scale) to make them contiguous, which infers that all the area in and between the shaded areas embraces a significantly large group of genetically related covariant attributes. These are the "natural" regions thought of by geographers, and the philosophy of their discrimination has been much discussed (Armand, 1965;Grigg, 1965Grigg, , 1967McDonald, 1966;Rodoman, 1965). Geologic formations are often so regarded~ although the Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature (Am.…”
Section: Units or Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%