Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If C is a Harrop formula in the context Γ then there exists a proof object f (z) such Γ, z : C | f (z) : C. 25 24 In this paper, we are solely interested in the variant of the Split rule where C is a Harrop formula, however, it might be interesting to consider also different variants. For example, a variant where C is an almost negative formula (Troelstra (1973)), or a normal formula (Nepeivoda (1978), Nepeivoda (1982)), or a singleton formula (Sasaki (1986)), or a rank 0 formula (Hayashi and Nakano (1988)) that generalize them all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If C is a Harrop formula in the context Γ then there exists a proof object f (z) such Γ, z : C | f (z) : C. 25 24 In this paper, we are solely interested in the variant of the Split rule where C is a Harrop formula, however, it might be interesting to consider also different variants. For example, a variant where C is an almost negative formula (Troelstra (1973)), or a normal formula (Nepeivoda (1978), Nepeivoda (1982)), or a singleton formula (Sasaki (1986)), or a rank 0 formula (Hayashi and Nakano (1988)) that generalize them all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%