2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-015-9345-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logics of Informational Interactions

Abstract: The pre-eminence of logical dynamics, over a static and purely propositional view of Logic, lies at the core of a new understanding of both formal epistemology and the logical foundations of quantum mechanics. Both areas appear at first sight to be based on purely static propositional formalisms, but in our view their fundamental operators are essentially dynamic in nature. Quantum logic can be best understood as the logic of physically-constrained informational interactions (in the form of measurements and en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet another direction for future work is to look at possibilities for reasoning about the balance measures in the object language. This would be challenging, among other things because the measures are not invariant under bisimulation (the latter point could be alleviated by requiring all agents to be named by some nominal 9 ). On a final note, in light of logical analyses of social concepts it could be interesting to give certain attributes to agents in the network.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet another direction for future work is to look at possibilities for reasoning about the balance measures in the object language. This would be challenging, among other things because the measures are not invariant under bisimulation (the latter point could be alleviated by requiring all agents to be named by some nominal 9 ). On a final note, in light of logical analyses of social concepts it could be interesting to give certain attributes to agents in the network.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a final note, in light of logical analyses of social concepts it could be interesting to give certain attributes to agents in the network. One alternative is knowledge, as in social epistemic frameworks such as [9,10,33,38]: could a polarized setting change depending on what agents know about their social situations? Another is communication: by implementing an information flow in the network we could analyze which agents are likely to become friends based on information and information access, e.g., by adopting a dynamic epistemic logic approach including public and private announcements [19].…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can use multiple techniques such as computer simulations, models in decision theory, etc., in order to assess the epistemic efficiency of a group. For instance, prominent approaches for investigating epistemic efficiencies from the perspective of philosophy of science are based on computer simulations (Kelly & Mayo-Wilson, 2010 ; Zollman, 2007 , 2010 ) and logical models (Baltag et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Motivation: Efficiency In Producing Scientific Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the latest development in this way is quantum modal logics. The research have been done by A. Baltag and S. Smets [4,5], F. Boge [8], V. Vilasini [22] and N. Nurgalieva [17]. Our study covers field of logic of correlated knowledge which is part of quantum modal logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%