2008
DOI: 10.1080/03085140701760841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logics of interdisciplinarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
382
0
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
382
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these challenges, systems biology is an excellent example of a field that is explicitly interdisciplinary, if this is defined as the integration and synthesis of perspectives from different disciplines (see Barry et al 2008;Thompson Klein 1990). This interdisciplinarity is driven both by the object of study and the questions that are being asked.…”
Section: Systems Biology As Big Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these challenges, systems biology is an excellent example of a field that is explicitly interdisciplinary, if this is defined as the integration and synthesis of perspectives from different disciplines (see Barry et al 2008;Thompson Klein 1990). This interdisciplinarity is driven both by the object of study and the questions that are being asked.…”
Section: Systems Biology As Big Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than emphasising integration of divergent analytic tools, we suggest that there is value in adopting an 'agonist-antagonist' mode of interdisciplinarity (Barry et al 2008), in which we 'keep it complex' (Stirling 2010), and pursue plural and diverse approaches rather than integration and synthesis. A number of recent articles suggest ways in which this might be achieved, through establishing 'dialogue' and 'constructive conflict' between model-based scenarios and narrative scenarios or historical analogies (McDowall 2014;McDowall in press), and using pluralist 'bridging strategies' (Turnheim et al 2015;Geels et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this background, the project under consideration is interdisciplinary, as it includes several disciplines and engages in integrated research, through shared research questions and a cross-sectional project. However, there are a lot of taxonomies of interdisciplinary research approaches, with various grades of intensity (Barry et al 2008, Buller 2009, Huutoniemi et al 2010. Despite this richness in theory, the operationalization is difficult and multiple dimensions, i.e., empirical, methodological, and theoretical interdisciplinarity, need to be considered (Huutoniemi et al 2010).…”
Section: Interdisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature contains various definitions of cross-disciplinary approaches, mostly with a widely acknowledged differentiation into the following categories: multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity (Barry et al 2008, Mobjörk 2010, Stock and Burton 2011. The differentiation between those categories can be made based on the actors involved and the motives of integration from a 'synthesis phase' to a shared problem definition (Mobjörk 2010).…”
Section: Interdisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%