2019
DOI: 10.2478/nor-2019-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logics of the Icelandic Hybrid Media System: Snapchat and media-use before the 2016 and 2017 Althing elections

Abstract: The increased importance of social media platforms and network media logic merging with traditional media logic are a trademark of modern hybrid systems of political communication. This article looks at this development through the media-use by politicians before the 2016 and 2017 parliamentary elections in Iceland. Aggregate results from candidate surveys on the use and perceived importance of different media forms are used to examine the role of the new platform Snapchat in relation to other media, and to hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social media, other than Facebook, was only moderately used in the 2018 election campaign, although Instagram seems considerably strong both in perceived importance and usage. However, it is Facebook that dominates the social media scene of candidates, which is indeed in line with other studies on media use of Icelandic politicians in elections (Bergsson 2014;Guðmundsson 2016Guðmundsson , 2019. In general, candidates do not seem to consider a lack of assistance from communication experts to be a problem, as only one-fifth agree with a statement to that effect ( Figure 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social media, other than Facebook, was only moderately used in the 2018 election campaign, although Instagram seems considerably strong both in perceived importance and usage. However, it is Facebook that dominates the social media scene of candidates, which is indeed in line with other studies on media use of Icelandic politicians in elections (Bergsson 2014;Guðmundsson 2016Guðmundsson , 2019. In general, candidates do not seem to consider a lack of assistance from communication experts to be a problem, as only one-fifth agree with a statement to that effect ( Figure 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Prior research on Icelandic political communications suggests that the political media system is characterized by hybridity (Guðmundsson 2016(Guðmundsson , 2019. Using data on the media -use and the perceived importance of media platforms of Icelandic politicians in the parliamentary elections of 2016 and 2017, Guðmundsson concludes that a hybrid media system is in place with a precarious balance between old and new logics, where traditional media logic is still dominating.…”
Section: Stjórnmál and Stjórnsýslamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The news content in the old media tends to be less because the logic of traditional media is based on the values of journalistic professionalism. This is certainly different from the logic of network media, which is more related to the logic of virality (Guðmundsson, 2019). This is also shown in the study of Vonbun, Königslöw & Schoenbach (2016), which explains that agenda setting during the Austrian national election campaign in thirty-eight newspapers, online news sites, television programs are mediated by agenda setters in digital media by looking at the characteristics of the issues raised.…”
Section: The Effect Of Public Mood In Constructing Newsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In general, the studies find that social media do not alter politicians' campaign practices drastically (Enli & Moe, 2013;Jungherr et al, 2020). Previously, legacy news media, such as tv, newspapers, and radio, was the main outlets for politicians to get their campaign communication out widely, and politicians within the Nordic context continue to perceive legacy media as important campaign tools in the social media age (Guðmundsson, 2016(Guðmundsson, , 2019Karlsen & Enjolras, 2016;Larsson & Skogerbø, 2018;Skovsgaard & van Dalen, 2013).…”
Section: Campaign Dynamics In a Social Media Age: The Nordic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars argued that this contributed to equalize politicians' opportunities during elections (Larsson & Kalsnes, 2014;Larsson & Skogerbø, 2018;Blach-Ørsten et al, 2017;Skovsgaard & van Dalen, 2013). As social media have become more established campaign tools, however, they are increasingly adopted and used by high status politicians as well (Guðmundsson, 2016(Guðmundsson, , 2019Linaa Jensen et al, 2015) -especially during the heat of elections (Sandberg & Öhberg, 2017). Scholars have attributed this a process of normalisation, where the power balance returns to the way it was before the new media emerged (Sandberg & Öhberg, 2017).…”
Section: Campaign Dynamics In a Social Media Age: The Nordic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%