2017
DOI: 10.1111/jen.12380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic growth of the host‐specific obligate insect pathogenic fungus Entomophthora muscae in house flies (Musca domestica)

Abstract: Insect pathogenic fungi (IPF) need to overcome the host immune system in order to sporulate and ensure transmission to new hosts. Some IPF produce immunosuppressive toxins, whereas others rely on rapid fungal proliferation to kill the host by sheer fungal mass, resulting in a trade‐off between allocating resources to toxin production and fungal proliferation. The obligate entomopathogenic fungus, Entomophthora muscae sensu stricto, is host specific to the common house fly, Musca domestica. E. muscae grows as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, infected SWD, similar to house flies, showed climbing and posturing of the abdomen with conidiospores growing out between the tergites and sclerites, to get actively discharged. In the natural housefly host, E. muscae disease development is characterized by initial exponential growth (Hansen and De Fine Licht 2017 ), immune avoidance by proliferating as protoplasts without cell walls (Latge et al 1988 ) and behavioural manipulation of hosts to enhance transmission at the final stages of infection (Roy et al 2006 ; Gryganskyi et al 2017 ). Although less synchronized in time-to-kill, the disease ontogeny and complex behavioural manipulation of E. muscae in SWD is similar to infections in housefly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, infected SWD, similar to house flies, showed climbing and posturing of the abdomen with conidiospores growing out between the tergites and sclerites, to get actively discharged. In the natural housefly host, E. muscae disease development is characterized by initial exponential growth (Hansen and De Fine Licht 2017 ), immune avoidance by proliferating as protoplasts without cell walls (Latge et al 1988 ) and behavioural manipulation of hosts to enhance transmission at the final stages of infection (Roy et al 2006 ; Gryganskyi et al 2017 ). Although less synchronized in time-to-kill, the disease ontogeny and complex behavioural manipulation of E. muscae in SWD is similar to infections in housefly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantageous attribute for application in pest control is that members of the E. muscae species complex are dipteran-specific, which in comparison with generalist pathogens implies a smaller range of susceptible non-target species. Intricate molecular interactions underlying host-specific adaptation of E. muscae have led to a more narrow host range as compared to generalist hypocrealean fungi such as M. robertsii and B. bassiana (De Fine Licht et al 2017 ; Hansen and De Fine Licht 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most stages of the infection cycle of E. muscae have been studied intensively [21][22][23]: conidia (spores) germinate on the host surface and penetrate through the insect cuticle into the haemolymph; the fungus proliferates logistically as protoplast cells until all nutrients are depleted; hyphal bodies and hyphae with cell walls are formed just before the host dies; rigid-walled conidiophores (spore-bearing stalks) penetrate outwards through the intersegmental membranes in the fly's abdomen; a single conidium is formed at the tip of each conidiophore (figure 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%