2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/dasa53625.2021.9682242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic Regression and Logistic Regression-Genetic Algorithm for Classification of Liver Cancer Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three types of logistic regression, the binary, where the dependent variables can only have two possible values, 1 or 0; the ordinal, for variables with ordered categories; and the multinominal, which is used when the dependent variable has three or more unordered categories. Given the characteristics of the problem to be solved, the most appropriate type is the binary (Wibowo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three types of logistic regression, the binary, where the dependent variables can only have two possible values, 1 or 0; the ordinal, for variables with ordered categories; and the multinominal, which is used when the dependent variable has three or more unordered categories. Given the characteristics of the problem to be solved, the most appropriate type is the binary (Wibowo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the advantages of our model, we compare it with some other related approaches, such as the logistic regression [13], which is the most common approach for pulmonary infection predicting. The metrics for performance evaluation include these three ones: Accuracy, Precision and Recall.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared with "Logistic Regression + AdaBoost", our method has significantly improved in all three evaluation indicators. Logistic Regression (both) [3] 95.1% 87.6% 91.1% Logistic Regression + FCNN [13] 84.8% 67.2% 73.7% GRA + FCNN [10] 88.6% 74.1% 90.2% PCA & GRA + Logistic Regression [4] 96.8% 90.5% 93.6% GRA + Random Forest [21] 97.1% 90.9% 94.2% Logistic Regression + AdaBoost [22] 97.8% 91.6% 95.0% Dynamic Predict (ours) 100% 95.7% 99.1%…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation