2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic regression with outcome and covariates missing separately or simultaneously

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Logistic regression is used to explain the relationship between a set of covariate or explanatory variables and a dichotomous response variable (Hsieh, Li, and Lee, 2013). Generally, such a regression is well suited for testing and describing the relationships between one or more categorical or continuous predictor variables and a categorical outcome variable (Peng, Lee, and Ingersoll, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Logistic regression is used to explain the relationship between a set of covariate or explanatory variables and a dichotomous response variable (Hsieh, Li, and Lee, 2013). Generally, such a regression is well suited for testing and describing the relationships between one or more categorical or continuous predictor variables and a categorical outcome variable (Peng, Lee, and Ingersoll, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turvey et al (2011);Vitor et al (2014) Proximity(distance) There is no influence of distance between borrowers and lenders to credit rationingPapias and Ganesan (2010);Vitor et al (2014);Li et al (2013) The case in formal MFI:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses logistic regression model to analyze the impact of GCG scheme on household poverty alleviation. According to Hsieh and Lee (2013), logistic regression can be used to explain the relationship between a set of covariate or explanatory variables and a dichotomous response variable. This regression is well suited for testing and describing the relationship between one or more categorical or continuous predictor variables and a categorical outcome variable (Peng, Lee and Ingersoll, 2002).…”
Section: F Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a joint conditional likelihood method that combines the validation and non-validation data to achieve higher efficiency. The method can be viewed as an extension of the methods of Wang et al (2002), Lee et al (2012), and Hsieh et al (2013). With a bit of algebra, it can be shown that the conditional probability of Y i given δ i = 1 is leftP(Yi=1|bold-italicXi,δi=1)=P(Yi = 1,δi = 1|Xi)P(Yi = 1,δi = 1|Xi)+P(Yi = 0,δi = 1|Xi)left=H{βTscriptXi + ln[1 cc]}H+(bold-italicXi;β). Meanwhile, the principle of the non-validation likelihood method is to estimate β by using the probability of …”
Section: A Special Case Of the Proposed Methods And Design Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%