Logistics 4.0 measurement model: empirical validation based on an international survey

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to provide a measurement model, and the underlying constructs and items, for Logistics 4.0 in manufacturing companies. Industry 4.0 technology for logistics processes has been termed Logistics 4.0. Logistics 4.0 and its elements have seen varied conceptualizations in the literature. The literature has mainly focused on conceptual and theoretical studies, which supports the notion that Logistics 4.0 is a relatively young area of research. Refinement of constructs and building consensus perspectives and definitions is necessary for practical and theoretical advances in this area.Design/methodology/approachBased on a detailed literature review and practitioner focus group interviews, items of Logistics 4.0 for manufacturing enterprises were further validated by using a large-scale survey with practicing experts from organizations located in Central Europe, the Northeastern United States of America and Northern Thailand. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to define a measurement model for Logistics 4.0.FindingsBased on 239 responses the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in nine items and three factors for the final Logistics 4.0 measurement model. It combines “the leveraging of increased organizational capabilities” (factor 1) with “the rise of interconnection and material flow transparency” (factor 2) and “the setting up of autonomization in logistics processes” (factor 3).Practical implicationsPractitioners can use the proposed measurement model to assess their current level of maturity regarding the implementation of Logistics 4.0 practices. They can map the current state and derive appropriate implementation plans as well as benchmark against best practices across or between industries based on these metrics.Originality/valueLogistics 4.0 is a relatively young research area, which necessitates greater development through empirical validation. To the best of the authors knowledge, an empirically validated multidimensional construct to measure Logistics 4.0 in manufacturing companies does not exist.

An exploratory study of organisational and industry drivers for the implementation of emerging technologies in logistics

“…In order to understand the organisational and industry-level drivers for the implementation of emerging technologies in logistics, it is important to refer to the literature to understand the logistics function in SCM. Logistics includes the management of the flows of goods and information from a point of origin to a point of consumption or final destination (Murphy and Wood, 2011;Dallasega et al, 2022;Lummus et al, 2001). Logistics management is usually divided into materials management and physical distribution management (Fernie and Sparks, 1998).…”

Research on Diversified Development Path of Media Industry in the New Media Era

“…Zhou et al analyzed the influence of digital media industry and the influence of media, and refined the specific indicators of media, market structure and norms of media products production and consumption according to the economic characteristics of media industry [5]. Dallasega et al divided media diversification into three types from the management direction: horizontal diversification, vertical diversification and cross-industry diversification [6]. Willig thinks that the diversification of newspaper industry includes the main business and diversified business outside the main business, and regards them as the relationship between inclusion and inclusion [7].…”

Innovating in data-driven production environments: simulation analysis of Net-CONWIP priority rule

“…In these new data-driven environments, innovation and productivity can be spurred, while waste can be drastically reduced by developing the ability to dynamically allocate scarce resources (Sarkis et al, 2021). The result is an increase in industrial capabilities through enhanced efficiency, flexibility and heightened responsiveness while improving process and product integrity (Dallasega et al, 2022).…”

“…, 2021). The result is an increase in industrial capabilities through enhanced efficiency, flexibility and heightened responsiveness while improving process and product integrity (Dallasega et al ., 2022).…”

“…(2016) and Rossit et al . (2019), the different attributes that characterise Industry 4.0 systems have been shown to involve various degrees of connectedness, collaboration networks, smart services, decentralised production control and data-driven operations, among others (Gomes et al ., 2018; Dallasega et al ., 2022). These attributes become additional concerns when innovating under Industry 4.0 paradigms.…”