Logistics service providers in China

Abstract

Purpose -The article attempts to study the current status and future prospects of logistics providers in the whole country as well as a comparatively developed Chinese city (Tianjin); reveal the disparities between China and Tianjin, as well as local firms and their foreign counterparts; and identify the challenges faced by Chinese logistics providers and offer managerial implications for logistics providers in an increasingly competitive environment. Design/methodology/approach -This research is based on two surveys conducted in China and Tianjin, respectively, under the support from government authorities. Comparative analyses were conducted to ascertain the differences between logistics firms in China and developed countries, as well as regional differences within China. Findings -The results reveal that Chinese logistics providers depend heavily on transportation and warehousing businesses but lack value-added services and logistics information management. Rate setting ranks highly in provider priority while the importance of lead-time performance is largely ignored. Significant regional differences in logistics exist and there is a long way for Chinese logistics providers to go in achieving international service standards. Most local firms wish to establish strategic alliances to enhance competitiveness. Originality/value -This research enriches the literature by investigating the current status and future prospects of logistics service providers in a transitional economy. China being an emerging player in the world economy, an understanding and assessment of China's logistics service providers is appropriate and timely. It offers invaluable information and implications for local providers, government authorities and foreign logistic service providers that are interested in the market.

Third-party purchase: an empirical study of Chinese third-party logistics users

“…We received 242 usable responses from 3PL users (a response rate of 15.3 percent). Although this response rate is relatively low, it is comparable to or slightly better than those obtained in other studies conducted in China (Wang et al, 2010;Lai et al, 2009;Hong et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2006). The typical response rate in China is from 10 to 15 percent (Wang et al, 1998).…”

Grado de Personalización de los Servicios Logísticos: Prioridades de Servicio y Desempeño

“…Un nivel elevado de personalización parece ser necesario para alcanzar un alto nivel de confiabilidad, debido a la necesidad de esas empresas de confiar en una densa red de socios para compensar por la falta de instituciones formales en esos países. Tal como se argumenta, en los países en desarrollo, la pobre infraestructura en comparación con países más avanzados, actúa como una barrera para lograr un mejor desempeño de los servicios y acentúa la necesidad por una coordinación más cercana entre los participantes logísticos en una cadena de suministro (Hong, Chin, and Liu, 2007;Hernández Apam et al, 2013).…”

Fostering sustainable logistics businesses: the role of innovation ecosystems and institutional contexts for logistics firms in China

“…Because of a wide array of intra-national differences in China, a firm's environmental behavior, such as technological innovation and green practices, can be influenced by the institutional characteristics of a particular subnational region (Hong, Chin, & Liu, 2007;Kshetri, 2009;Mike W Peng & Lebedev, 2017). Chinese LSPs in well-established institutions face less government interference, which gives them an edge, e.g., lower operational costs over their competitors in less well-established institutions.…”