2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00287-015-0876-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistik 4.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enterprises are currently faced with tremendous market changes forcing them to critically scrutinize the way in which they create value and serve customers (Davis, 2013; Ten Hompel and Kerner, 2015; Harmon, 2016). New technologies such as “social media” or “internet of things” lead to an increasing market transparency by reducing information asymmetries between sellers and buyers (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enterprises are currently faced with tremendous market changes forcing them to critically scrutinize the way in which they create value and serve customers (Davis, 2013; Ten Hompel and Kerner, 2015; Harmon, 2016). New technologies such as “social media” or “internet of things” lead to an increasing market transparency by reducing information asymmetries between sellers and buyers (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistics 4.0 definitions are vague as the concept is not homogenous, being at its initial stage of development [3]. Publications on the subject aim to present Logistics 4.0 as a trend important in logistics [4], solutions within it [5], the role of lifelong learning [6], key competences development [7], and knowledge management. They also refer to the challenges of contemporary markets that logistics have to face, such as information exchange, automation [8], and real-time big data analysis and link Logistics 4.0 to contemporary management paradigms such as sustainability [9].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When central processes, structures and resources are fragmented and geared towards decentralisation, agility and speed (Gehrke 2017, Hompel andHenke 2014), production planning needs to become more flexible, too. For example, the current DCM process is no longer able to cope with the large number of planning impulses and the complexity of demand and capacity information.…”
Section: Challenges Of the Automotive Dcmmentioning
confidence: 99%