2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-013-1449-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logo detection with extendibility and discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dataset Logo # Object # Image # PA BelgaLogos [20] 37 2,695 1,951 Yes FlickrLogos-27 [21] 27 4,536 810 Yes FlickrLogos-32 [33] 32 3404 2,240 Yes LOGO-NET [16] 160 130,608 73,414 No is extremely costly [16] and unaffordable in most cases, not only in monetary but more critically in timescale terms. In the current literature, most existing studies on logo detection are limited to small scales, in both the number of logo images and logo classes [18,23], largely due to the high costs in constructing large scale logo datasets. It is non-trivial to collect automatically large scale logo training data that covers a large number of different logo classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dataset Logo # Object # Image # PA BelgaLogos [20] 37 2,695 1,951 Yes FlickrLogos-27 [21] 27 4,536 810 Yes FlickrLogos-32 [33] 32 3404 2,240 Yes LOGO-NET [16] 160 130,608 73,414 No is extremely costly [16] and unaffordable in most cases, not only in monetary but more critically in timescale terms. In the current literature, most existing studies on logo detection are limited to small scales, in both the number of logo images and logo classes [18,23], largely due to the high costs in constructing large scale logo datasets. It is non-trivial to collect automatically large scale logo training data that covers a large number of different logo classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative results on the FlickrLogos-32 database. We report the results achieved with the proposed method, by our older method (Boia&Florea (Boia and Florea, 2015)), and by the methods introduced by Li et al (Li et al, 2014), Lu et al (Lu et al, 2014) and respectively Romberg et al (Romberg and Lienhart, 2013). Figure 13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Li et al (Li et al, 2014) used a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to select the HoG described potential windows of interest and further classify them with affine SIFT and nearest neighbor; yet they still report precision and recall instead of detection rate. A summary of existing works may also be followed in table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the process of finding region candidates, Li, Chen, and Su [19] proposed sliding window scanning technique that produces a set of candidate windows of various sizes. For each candidate windows, histograms of oriented gradient (HOGE) feature are extracted and Support Vector Machine (SVM) model is then used to recognize logo in the respective window.…”
Section: Related Work a Logo Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%