2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logrank-type tests for comparing survival curves with interval-censored data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, to apply it, one has to determine Ŝ 0 . Recently Kim et al [36] suggested a modification to the procedure that does not require Ŝ 0 by assuming that T i follows the uniform distribution over the observed interval.…”
Section: Comparison Of Survival Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, to apply it, one has to determine Ŝ 0 . Recently Kim et al [36] suggested a modification to the procedure that does not require Ŝ 0 by assuming that T i follows the uniform distribution over the observed interval.…”
Section: Comparison Of Survival Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted on the comparison of several survival functions with intervalcensored data. Among these, those using rank-based nonparametric tests include Self and Grossman (1986), Fay (1996), Sun (1996), Pan (2000), Zhao and Sun (2004) and Kim et al (2006). Zhao and Sun (2004) proposed a nonparametric test which is a generalization of the most commonly used log-rank test for right-censored data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their test has advantages over the test proposed in Sun (1996) since it applies to both discrete and continuous failure time data and reduces to the log-rank test for right-censored data. Unlike the test proposed by Zhao and Sun (2004), Kim et al (2006) proposed log-rank-type tests that do not require the use of an EM algorithm because they introduced uniform weights that would depend only on the size of the risk set at each observed time instead of the weights involving estimated survivals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations