“…However, when juxtaposed with the essence of the commission's activity, as expressed in Article 38a paragraph 1 of the Law on County Government, the purpose of which is to carry out the county governor's tasks of supervising county services, inspections and guards, as well as statutorily defined tasks in the area of citizen security and order with the essence of the overriding good of security and order, its unity at every level (Pieprzny, 2003), local, regional, state, as evidenced by the wide composition of the commissions, their funding only from the county budget is no longer such an obvious matter. Thus, it should be admitted that the thesis that the categorization of tasks into own and commissioned (entrusted), especially with regard to the tasks of the county of a unitary nature, and such is security and order, is an outdated division (Olejniczak-Szałowska, 2000), artificial in its assumption, used for the purpose of determining the independence of local government units (Niewiadomski, 1998). This opens up a discussion as to whether the financing of the commission for security and order should be covered solely by the county budget, or whether it should not, in view of its unitarian value, at least in part be satisfied by external funds from the state budget or local government units that are part of the relevant counties.…”