2020
DOI: 10.7765/9781526128812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lollards in the English Reformation

Abstract: Politics, culture and society in early modern Britain General Editors professor alastair bellany dr alexandra gajda professor peter lake professor anthony milton professor jason peacey This important series publishes monographs that take a fresh and challenging look at the interactions between politics, culture and society in Britain between 1500 and the mid-eighteenth century. It counteracts the fragmentation of current historiography through encouraging a variety of approaches which attempt to redefine the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventicles were banned on three separate occasions in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. 77 Some later interpolations in town books included oaths of supremacy alongside civic oaths that were recorded in an earlier period, suggesting that the politics of oath-taking (and fealty to the Crown in particular) were not only matters of local concern but also part of wide-ranging changes in religious policy after 1540. J. Michael Gray has argued that oath-taking during the English Reformation was itself a vehicle through which religious and political transformation was solidified, going so far as to claim that the Henrician Reformation did not just depend on the promises of fealty contained in oaths, but that the act of oath-taking constituted the entire foundation upon which the Reformation rested.…”
Section: Citizen Secrecy and Its Meaningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventicles were banned on three separate occasions in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. 77 Some later interpolations in town books included oaths of supremacy alongside civic oaths that were recorded in an earlier period, suggesting that the politics of oath-taking (and fealty to the Crown in particular) were not only matters of local concern but also part of wide-ranging changes in religious policy after 1540. J. Michael Gray has argued that oath-taking during the English Reformation was itself a vehicle through which religious and political transformation was solidified, going so far as to claim that the Henrician Reformation did not just depend on the promises of fealty contained in oaths, but that the act of oath-taking constituted the entire foundation upon which the Reformation rested.…”
Section: Citizen Secrecy and Its Meaningsmentioning
confidence: 99%