“…Before the development of the SHS, most instruments for SWB were constructed as multidimensional measures (Chien et al, 2009; Diener, Smith, & Fujita, 1995; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). However, recently, the SHS has been used to represent SWB and proposed to be either a predictor/mediator or an outcome in various studies (e.g., Datu, Valdez, Cabrera, & Salanga, 2017; Han, Kim, Lee, & Lee, 2013; Lauriola & Iani, 2017; Swami, Tran, Stieger, Voracek, & The YouBeauty.com Team, 2015; Yan, Su, Zhu, & He, 2013). Currently, the SHS has become one of the most frequently used instruments based on the global approach (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999) and has already been translated into various languages (e.g., Extremera & Fernández-Berrocal, 2014; Quezada, Landero, & González, 2016).…”