2021
DOI: 10.1177/10398562211059086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-acting injectable buprenorphine – ‘best practice’ opioid agonist therapy for Australian prisoners

Abstract: Objective To consider opioid agonist therapy in prisons. Conclusions Given the substantial risks of substance misuse by prisoners, long-acting injectable buprenorphine should be adopted as ‘best practice’ treatment in Australian prison populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our sample was recruited more than a decade ago. Changes in AOD treatment practice in Queensland prisons since study recruitment include the introduction of medication‐assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid dependence in some prisons; however, coverage remains poor, and ‘best practice’ injectable buprenorphine [ 67 , 68 ] is not currently used, to the best of our knowledge. Given evidence that MAT has a modest protective effect, that rates of return to substance use after release from prison remain high even among those receiving MAT in prison [ 69 , 70 ] and that the vast majority of our sample reported moderate/high‐risk use of substances other than opioids, we are confident that our findings remain relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our sample was recruited more than a decade ago. Changes in AOD treatment practice in Queensland prisons since study recruitment include the introduction of medication‐assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid dependence in some prisons; however, coverage remains poor, and ‘best practice’ injectable buprenorphine [ 67 , 68 ] is not currently used, to the best of our knowledge. Given evidence that MAT has a modest protective effect, that rates of return to substance use after release from prison remain high even among those receiving MAT in prison [ 69 , 70 ] and that the vast majority of our sample reported moderate/high‐risk use of substances other than opioids, we are confident that our findings remain relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could also possibly be because of the higher mortality rate observed for this group during follow‐up, although this result should be interpreted with caution, because our groups were not mutually exclusive. Long‐acting injectable buprenorphine is the current gold standard for treating opioid dependence and is strongly recommended for use in custodial settings [ 58 , 59 ] to help prevent poor opioid‐related health outcomes during incarceration and after release. The ASSIST may be a useful tool for informing service providers who is most in need of this treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, opioids have been a major focus of research, policy and treatment for those in prison [ 58 , 59 , 60 ]. However, the high rates of methamphetamine‐related hospitalisation we observed throughout follow‐up echo evidence elsewhere that methamphetamine use is now also an important driver of poor outcomes such as hospitalisation [ 61 , 62 ] and deaths [ 63 ] in different parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sadly, in some Australian jurisdictions, there are still large numbers of prisoners who cannot access long-acting opioid agonist therapy during their imprisonment. 7…”
Section: Substance Misuse In Prisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%