2022
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐acting injectable Cabotegravir: How drug concentrations could help guide patient management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the PBPK model simulated the ideal clinical scenario in which all virtual individuals received the injection in the muscle, whereas real-world data have shown injection site variability [ 31 ]. Thus, our model does not reproduce the variability reported in real-world studies [ 25 , 32 , 33 ], which was not always explained by differences in BMI [ 34 ]. As matter of fact, young and older individuals with similar BMIs may have different tissue distributions [ 35 ] which may increase the risk of receiving the injection in the adipose tissue rather than the muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the PBPK model simulated the ideal clinical scenario in which all virtual individuals received the injection in the muscle, whereas real-world data have shown injection site variability [ 31 ]. Thus, our model does not reproduce the variability reported in real-world studies [ 25 , 32 , 33 ], which was not always explained by differences in BMI [ 34 ]. As matter of fact, young and older individuals with similar BMIs may have different tissue distributions [ 35 ] which may increase the risk of receiving the injection in the adipose tissue rather than the muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As matter of fact, young and older individuals with similar BMIs may have different tissue distributions [ 35 ] which may increase the risk of receiving the injection in the adipose tissue rather than the muscle. Moreover, the variability could be related to changes in blood flow [ 33 , 34 ]. Thus, further data are needed to investigate the source of variability in the pharmacokinetics of LA injectables together with the related drug response in both young and older PWH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real-world studies, including controlled clinical trials, have shown a large interindividual variability in drug concentrations. 21,44 This variability relates to factors that were not included in the model, such as the ventrogluteal injection site (i.e., in realworld practice, the injected drug does not always reach the muscle but can be deposited in the subcutaneous tissue), injection technique (i.e., a longer needle length needs to be used in obese individuals which is not always done in practice), and split injections (i.e., splitting the injected dose was shown to increase the drug absorption). 45,46 The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the drug release from the depot is influenced by the physicochemical properties of the drug and by the physiology of the injection site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictions were within twofold of the observed clinical data; however, the population variability was underpredicted by the model as it assumes that the drug always reaches the muscle. The real‐world studies, including controlled clinical trials, have shown a large interindividual variability in drug concentrations 21,44 . This variability relates to factors that were not included in the model, such as the ventrogluteal injection site (i.e., in real‐world practice, the injected drug does not always reach the muscle but can be deposited in the subcutaneous tissue), injection technique (i.e., a longer needle length needs to be used in obese individuals which is not always done in practice), and split injections (i.e., splitting the injected dose was shown to increase the drug absorption) 45,46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%