2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00039-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of randomised, cohort, and pre–post studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
202
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
7
202
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our study showed improvement of attitude toward medication and treatment adherence over the course of the study, alongside with improvement of psychiatric symptoms. This is in line with recent meta-analyses, showing benefits of LAIs prescription in early psychosis ( 52 ), as well as in the treatment maintenance of schizophrenia ( 18 , 20 ), not only in research settings but also in real-world clinical practice. Second, our findings support an association between the considered predictors and severity of psychiatric symptoms at the three selected timepoints, when considered independently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, our study showed improvement of attitude toward medication and treatment adherence over the course of the study, alongside with improvement of psychiatric symptoms. This is in line with recent meta-analyses, showing benefits of LAIs prescription in early psychosis ( 52 ), as well as in the treatment maintenance of schizophrenia ( 18 , 20 ), not only in research settings but also in real-world clinical practice. Second, our findings support an association between the considered predictors and severity of psychiatric symptoms at the three selected timepoints, when considered independently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is well-known that oral and long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are similarly tolerable ( 14 ) and effective in the treatment of severe mental illnesses. Nevertheless, there is a literature debate on this topic, with randomized trials in clinically stable individuals showing a similar efficacy profile ( 15 ), and with large observational studies favoring LAI over oral antipsychotics in terms of re-hospitalizations ( 16 18 ). Observational studies might be less restrictive in terms of patient selection and have higher external validity, although an increased risk of detection, performance and prescribing bias may represent a relevant limitation ( 19 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most important, LAIs provide several therapeutic benefits over OAs that go beyond improved adherence. In a meta-analysis of studies comparing LAIs with OAs across three designs (randomized trials, mirror image studies, and cohort studies), LAIs were consistently associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization and/or relapses [37]. Moreover, LAIs were superior to OAs in 20% of the 337 reported outcomes, whereas OAs were not superior to LAIs on any outcome, including tolerability.…”
Section: Improved Adherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, perceptions about the relative safety of OAs may be influenced by poor adherence [40,41]. Importantly, SGA-LAIs have a different aqueous formulation/suspension than FGA-LAIs, and this has helped reduce the occurrence of Patients on an LAI experience breakthrough psychosis [48,49] The rate of breakthrough psychosis is similar among LAIs and OAs [49], and the benefit-risk ratio supports use of LAIs [27]; when breakthrough occurs, it is clear whether or not medication was taken X X X X Patients on LAIs can also become nonadherent to LAI use [35] Adherence rates are higher and discontinuation rates are lower for LAIs than for OAs [22,32,42], nonadherent patients can be immediately identified if a dosing appointment is missed [76], and relapses are delayed because of longer half-lives of LAIs [36] X X X Many HCPs lack experience/knowledge of LAIs; therefore, target population should remain limited [10] HCPs can be educated [78]; HCPs with LAI prescribing experience are supportive of LAI use [60] X X Dosing of an LAI is difficult to adjust, and it would be dangerous to treat patients without knowing if the most appropriate medication has been selected [59] Per drug prescribing information and recommendations, a short trial with an OA or short-duration LAI should occur to assess tolerability and efficacy, followed by a transition to the LAI formulation of the same drug [60] X X X Providers do not have the proper resources or background to set up the complicated infrastructure needed to administer LAIs [14,54,77] The long-term nature of the disease is worthy of training professionals and setting up a coordinated care team to improve outcomes, including a decrease in hospitalizations and mortality [16,22,37,51]; a coordinated care team can be organized by collaborating with experts and specialty clinics [62,63] X X X Suggesting an LAI early on in treatment will impede patient autonomy [87] Early treatment success correlates with patient acceptance of treatment and improved adherence [3,…”
Section: Greater Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Atypical LAI antipsychotics compared with their oral equivalents are more favorable for rate of relapse, adherence to treatment, and preventing hospitalization. [5][6][7][8] In Canada, the available LAI antipsychotics are risperidone, paliperidone palmitate, aripiprazole monohydrate, flupentixol decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, and zuclopenthixol decanoate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%