2005
DOI: 10.1090/s0894-0347-05-00502-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long arithmetic progressions in sumsets: Thresholds and bounds

Abstract: For a set A A of integers, the sumset l A = A + ⋯ + A lA =A+\dots +A consists of those numbers which can be represented as a sum of l l elements of A A : \[ l A = { a 1 + ⋯ + a l | a i ∈ A i … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(The length of an arithmetic progression is the number of its terms, less 1). As indicated in [SV06], "many estimates for f (n, k, l) have been discovered by Bourgain, Freiman, Halberstam, Green, Ruzsa, and Sárközy". It is worth noting in this connection that Theorem 2 establishes the exact value of this function for k large; namely, it is easy to deduce from Theorem 2 (and keeping in mind the trivial example…”
Section: Background and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(The length of an arithmetic progression is the number of its terms, less 1). As indicated in [SV06], "many estimates for f (n, k, l) have been discovered by Bourgain, Freiman, Halberstam, Green, Ruzsa, and Sárközy". It is worth noting in this connection that Theorem 2 establishes the exact value of this function for k large; namely, it is easy to deduce from Theorem 2 (and keeping in mind the trivial example…”
Section: Background and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Though the proof of Theorem 3, presented in [SV06], is constructive, the constants C and c are not computed explicitly. Indeed, the argument leads to excessively large values of these constants, which may present a problem in some applications.…”
Section: Background and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.3 is an existential result about an arithmetic progression (of stepsize 1) in the set of all subset sums, and thus belongs to the realm of additive combinatorics, see [47] for an overview. Arithmetic progressions in the set of all subsets sums have been studied at least since early work of Alon [4], see also the literature by Erdős, Freiman, Sárközy, Szemerédi, and others [5,21,23,33,34,35,42,43,46]. A result of this type is also implicit in the algorithm by Galil and Margalit [25], but only applies to sets.…”
Section: Structural Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to be expected since there are lots of collisions when forming subset sums of {a 1 , • • • , a d } when d ≥ p 1/8+ε , and thus H should have rich additive structures. This type of phenomenon from subset sums or iterated sumsets was studied in [13,14]. Then we use character sum estimates to show that P must contain primitive roots; see Proposition 3.2 below.…”
Section: Previously the Best Known Upper Bound Is F (P)mentioning
confidence: 99%