2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2020.106103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-chain linear alcohols: Reconciliation of phase transition enthalpies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table , the molar enthalpies of vaporization at 298.15 K for these compounds almost match within the experimental uncertainties. The molar enthalpy of vaporization has been shown to have a linear dependency on the number of carbon atoms in an aliphatic chain. , This phenomenon explains the increase of the molar enthalpy of vaporization for the Bu-NENA compound in comparison to short-chain length Me-NENA and Et-NENA.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As can be seen in Table , the molar enthalpies of vaporization at 298.15 K for these compounds almost match within the experimental uncertainties. The molar enthalpy of vaporization has been shown to have a linear dependency on the number of carbon atoms in an aliphatic chain. , This phenomenon explains the increase of the molar enthalpy of vaporization for the Bu-NENA compound in comparison to short-chain length Me-NENA and Et-NENA.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Inclusion of experimental vapor pressures at low pressures not accessible by ebulliometry might be therefore helpful. In comparison to Nichols et al, 110 inclusion of 1-decanol vapor pressures measured near room temperature by Kulikov et al 115 changed the reference vapor pressures in Schultz et al, 111 Keating et al, 69 and Nelson and Chickos 112 by nearly 20% near 298 K (see Figure 12); 1-hexadecanol vapor pressures reported by Kulikov et al 115 were however dropped in a subsequent study by Albinsaad et al 113 Vapor pressures for 1-heptadecanol and 1-octadecanol were measured by the transpiration method 119 in 2020, which makes comparison with p GLC from 2006 110 feasible. Such a comparison was reported by Albinsaad et al 113 in the form of an ln p vs 1/T plot.…”
Section: N-alkanesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As this representation is not very sensitive to differences in vapor pressures, relative deviations are shown in Figure 13. Differences between new direct experiments 119 and previous CGC-based values 110 (which seem to be increasing with decreasing temperatures) were considered acceptable. Thus, reference p GLC determined in 2006 by Nichols et al 110 were kept (despite the fact that vaporization enthalpies determined in 2006 by Nichols et al 110 were replaced by vaporization enthalpies derived from new vapor pressure data 119 ).…”
Section: N-alkanesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations