Long‐distance dispersal by a male sub‐adult tiger in a human‐dominated landscape

Abstract

Conservation of wide‐ranging species and their movement is a major challenge in an increasingly fragmented world. Long‐distance movement, such as dispersal, is a key factor for the persistence of population, enabling the movement of animals within and between populations. Here, we describe one of the longest dispersal journeys by a sub‐adult male tiger (Panthera tigris) through GPS telemetry in Central India. We analyzed movement metrics, directionality, and space use during three behavioral stages of dispersal. We also used the clustering method to identify resting and kill sites (n = 89). T1‐C1 dispersed a straight‐line distance of 315 km over 225 days, moving an average of 8.38 km/day and covering a cumulative displacement of ~3000 km. Movement rate during post‐dispersal was faster (mean = 0.47 km/h) than during dispersal (mean = 0.38 km/h) and pre‐dispersal (mean = 0.13 km/h), respectively. The overall movement rate during the night (0.44 km/h) was significantly faster than during the day (0.21 km/h). Likewise, during dispersal, the movement was faster (mean = 0.52 km/h) at night than day (0.24 km/h). The average size of clusters, signifying resting and kill sites, was 1.68 ha and primarily away from human habitation (mean = 1.89 km). The individual crossed roads faster (mean = 2.00 km/h) than it traveled during other times. During the post‐dispersal phase, T1‐C1 had a space use of 319.48 km2 (95% dBBMM) in the Dnyanganga Wildlife Sanctuary. The dispersal event highlights the long‐distance and multiscale movement behavior in a heterogeneous landscape. Moreover, small forest patches play a key role in maintaining large carnivore connectivity while dispersing through a human‐dominated landscape. Our study underlines how documenting the long‐distance movement and integrating it with modern technology can improve conservation management decisions.

Long‐distance swimming by African lions in Uganda

“…According to a recent evaluation by the UN (UNEP‐WCMC, 2024 ), this anthropogenic pressure, particularly in the form of habitat loss and fragmentation, is driving the decline of 44% of the world's migratory species. Long‐distance dispersal events (Hussain et al., 2022 ), temporary refuges in human infrastructure (Odden et al., 2014 ), and even persistence in war zones (Daskin & Pringle, 2018 ) have become common in large felids (Fattebert et al., 2013 ), elephants (Fernando et al., 2023 ), and bears (Bartoń et al., 2019 ). Such risk taking is common across both sexes in the animal kingdom, but due to antagonistic interactions, and polygamy, some species die younger in their search for females, and attempts to breed (Lemaître et al., 2020 ).…”

Restoring Asia’s roar: Opportunities for tiger recovery across the historic range

“…Such innovations need to move beyond protection to the reexpansion of nature including ecosystem restoration and rewilding (Svenning, 2020). The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021)(2022)(2023)(2024)(2025)(2026)(2027)(2028)(2029)(2030) is a rallying call for the protection and revival of ecosystems and highlights that a strong connection exists between recovering nature and sustainable human development (Perino et al, 2019). Large carnivores have the potential to be leveraged as symbols for ecosystem restoration.…”

The fine‐scale movement pattern of Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) responds to winter habitat permeability

“…For tiger movement analysis, many researchers have studied factors such as home range, daily activity patterns, dispersal across the landscape, and landscape connectivity using data from satellite tracking collars (Goodrich et al, 2010; Hussain et al, 2022; Krishnamurthy et al, 2016; Rozhnov et al, 2011). In these studies, the time interval between localizations was usually between 20 min and 36 h, and the trajectory between localizations was straight (“Euclidean distance”).…”