2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.012332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-distance quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

Abstract: Quantum key distribution over probabilistic quantum repeaters is addressed. We compare, under practical assumptions, two such schemes in terms of their secret key generation rates per quantum memory. The two schemes under investigation are the one proposed by Duan et al. [Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001)]a n dt h a t of Sangouard et al. [ Phys. Rev. A 76, 050301 (2007)]. We consider various sources of imperfection in both protocols, such as nonzero double-photon probabilities at the sources, dark counts in det… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the typical sources of error, such as loss and dark count, the above expressions are functions of misalignment parameters. This misalignment could be a statistical error in the polarization stability of our setup, modelled by e dA and e dB , or an effective misalignment because of memory dephasing [64] and/or background photons. Putting all these effects together, as we have done in appendix D, we obtain Equation (3.8) can also be used in the case of indirectly heralding QMs as explained in appendix D. The main idea is to use the analogy of each leg in figure 1(b) with the original MDI-QKD in figure 1(c).…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the typical sources of error, such as loss and dark count, the above expressions are functions of misalignment parameters. This misalignment could be a statistical error in the polarization stability of our setup, modelled by e dA and e dB , or an effective misalignment because of memory dephasing [64] and/or background photons. Putting all these effects together, as we have done in appendix D, we obtain Equation (3.8) can also be used in the case of indirectly heralding QMs as explained in appendix D. The main idea is to use the analogy of each leg in figure 1(b) with the original MDI-QKD in figure 1(c).…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore assume that, by driving this memory with short pulses, one can ideally generate the jointly entangled state in equation (2.1) between the memory and a photon [39], where, in this case, | 〉 s H and | 〉 s V are, respectively, the corresponding symmetric collective excited states to horizontal and vertical polarizations [15,37]. By keeping the entangling efficiency low at η = 0.05 ent , here, we try to keep the effect of multiple excitations in such memories low [35,66,64]; further analysis is, however, required to fully account for such effects [45]. We also assume that = T T 2 1 and use the state-of-the-art single-photon detectors with η = 0.93 d at γ = 1 dc count per second and 150 ps of time resolution [67] for all systems.…”
Section: Realistic Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a click on the non-resolving detector r 0 , and no click on r 1 , can be modeled by the following measurement operator[19] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation in going to further distances is dictated by the exponentially-growing loss factor in optical fibers [3]. Probabilistic quantum repeaters offer a solution to extend the communication distance to over thousands of kilometers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, such quantum repeaters rely on quantum memory modules [11] with characteristics that are hard to achieve with the current technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of which resembles a noiseless linear amplifier (NLA) [31] and involves an entangling procedure that is based on the method described in [8,32]. Simply, the user's photons are passed through a NLA before storing them into the quantum memories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%