1980
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(80)90213-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Long-loop’ reflexes can be obtained in spinal monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be speculated that the low long-latency EMG activity recorded during those cycles resulted mainly from some spinal neuronal reflex mechanisms set at a very low level by higher nervous centres. This suggestion is also supported by the above-cited experiment of Tracey et al (1980), who showed in cats that long-latency EMG responses to triceps surae stretching were still present, though attenuated, after cutting off the supraspinal influence by a spinal section at the Th 12 level.…”
Section: Electromyogramsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It may be speculated that the low long-latency EMG activity recorded during those cycles resulted mainly from some spinal neuronal reflex mechanisms set at a very low level by higher nervous centres. This suggestion is also supported by the above-cited experiment of Tracey et al (1980), who showed in cats that long-latency EMG responses to triceps surae stretching were still present, though attenuated, after cutting off the supraspinal influence by a spinal section at the Th 12 level.…”
Section: Electromyogramsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For instance, Ghez and Shinoda (1978) have shown in the spinal cat that these responses can involve the spinal pathway only. This result was claimed again by Tracey et al (1980) in the spinal monkey without any clear experimental evidence, whereas North and Tatton (1980) have emphasized the differences observed between species: "In the cat, motor cortical neuron (MCN) activity does not contribute to the generation of the 2nd EMG response peak, in support of the transection studies and in contrast to MCN activity related to the M2 response for monkey distal upper limb musculature." Lastly, from their recent studies on man, Hagbarth et al (1981) have claimed that the segmented EMG responses are almost solely due to segmented afferent burst rather than multiple central reflex pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The net result of this arrangement as measured via surface electromyography would be a progressive reduction in gain-scaling. In fact, while it is well established that the long-latency response for the upper limb includes a cortical contribution from M1 (Matthews 1991), it has also been shown that phasic-activity within the long-latency epoch is present in decerebrate cats (Ghez and Shinoda 1978) and in both decerebrate (Miller and Brooks 1981) and spinalized monkeys (Tracey et al 1980). Taken together with these previous observations, our present results are consistent with the notion that long-latency activity is composed of at least two separate circuits which overlap in time (Pruszynski et al 2008b).…”
Section: Intermediate Gain-scaling In the Long-latency Epochmentioning
confidence: 99%