2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long memory dynamics for multivariate dependence under heavy tails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamics more complicated than those specified in Eq. (3) can also be added to the specification; see for example Janus et al [2011] for fractionally integrated dynamics, Creal et al [2013] for higher-order dynamics, and Harvey and Luati [2014] for both higher-order dynamics and structural time series dynamics. For our current purposes, however, the GAS(1,1) dynamics suffice.…”
Section: Score-driven Ewmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamics more complicated than those specified in Eq. (3) can also be added to the specification; see for example Janus et al [2011] for fractionally integrated dynamics, Creal et al [2013] for higher-order dynamics, and Harvey and Luati [2014] for both higher-order dynamics and structural time series dynamics. For our current purposes, however, the GAS(1,1) dynamics suffice.…”
Section: Score-driven Ewmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the more surprising given the typical fat-tailed nature of such data. Incidental large observations may easily corrupt the estimated dynamic pattern of the underlying covariance matrix if distributions with relatively thin tails are used; see Creal, Koopman, and Lucas (2011), Janus, Koopman, and Lucas (2014), Harvey (2013), and Lucas, Schwaab, and Zhang (2014). The matrix-F distribution provides a coherent approach to address such sensitivities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not matter whether they are real-valued, integer-valued, (0, 1)-bounded or strictly positive, as long as there is a conditional density for which the score function and the Hessian are well-defined. The practical relevance of the GAS framework has been illustrated in the case of financial risk forecasting (see e.g., Harvey and Sucarrat (2014) for market risk, Oh and Patton (2016) for systematic risk, and Creal, Schwaab, Koopman, and Lucas (2014) for credit risk analysis), dependence modeling (see e.g., Harvey and Thiele (2016) and Janus, Koopman, and Lucas (2014)), and spatial econometrics (see e.g., Blasques, Koopman, Lucas, and Schaumburg (2016b) and Catania and Billé (2017)). For a more complete overview of the work on GAS models, we refer the reader to the GAS community page at http://www.gasmodel.com/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%