1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Range Hydrophobic Forces between Mica Surfaces in Dodecylammonium Chloride Solutions in the Presence of Dodecanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
48
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable results were recently obtained in simulations, where the adhesion behavior was shown to depend crucially on the surface adhesion energy (19). A transition between dry adhesion and hydration repulsion was seen for typical surface contact angle values in the range of θ adh = 65°-85°, depending on the mechanical stiffness and the hydrogen-bonding capability of the surfaces (19), the values of θ adh being quite similar to those in experiments (15)(16)(17)(18).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparable results were recently obtained in simulations, where the adhesion behavior was shown to depend crucially on the surface adhesion energy (19). A transition between dry adhesion and hydration repulsion was seen for typical surface contact angle values in the range of θ adh = 65°-85°, depending on the mechanical stiffness and the hydrogen-bonding capability of the surfaces (19), the values of θ adh being quite similar to those in experiments (15)(16)(17)(18).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, experiments probing the interactions between similar neutral surfaces with well-defined contact angles demonstrated that even hydrophilic surfaces exhibit short-range attractions not accountable by vdW forces down to typical adhesive contact angles of θ adh = 65°-80° (15)(16)(17)(18). Comparable results were recently obtained in simulations, where the adhesion behavior was shown to depend crucially on the surface adhesion energy (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The range and origin of this interaction has remained unresolved for 20 years (3,9,10). Suggested mechanisms for the long-range hydrophobic attraction include two mainly theoretical and two more experimental models as follows: (i) water structure (2,3,11), (ii) electrostatic models based on fluctuating dipoles (3,10,12,13), (iii) preexisting submicroscopic bubbles that bridge the surfaces (10,(14)(15)(16)(17), and (iv) the spontaneous nucleation of bridging cavities as two hydrophobic surfaces approach each other. In both the latter cases, the surfaces will be pulled together through capillary (Laplace pressure) forces (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up experiments by numerous other investigators also showed the presence of the attractive structural force, which was appropriately referred to as hydrophobic force (Christenson and Claesson, 2001). It was shown that the hydrophobic force increases with increasing water contact angle (Yoon and Ravishankar, 1996). Other investigators showed, on the other hand, that the long-28 range attractions observed with hydrophobic surfaces are actually the capillary forces created by coalescing air bubbles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%