2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long range interactions between object-motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth

Abstract: Self-motion through a three-dimensional array of objects creates a radial flow pattern on the retina. We superimposed a simulated object moving in depth on such a flow pattern to investigate the effect of the flow pattern on judgments of both the time to collision (TTC) with an approaching object and the trajectory of that object. Our procedure allowed us to decouple the direction and speed of simulated self motion-in-depth (MID) from the direction and speed of simulated object MID. In Experiment 1 we found th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have found a decreased ability to perceive movement in depth when moving objects are present (Gray, Macuga, & Regan, 2004). Results of these studies, considered together, suggest that both expansion and bearing information are used in detecting a collision and the efficacy of these information sources may be reduced when objects are present in the scene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other studies have found a decreased ability to perceive movement in depth when moving objects are present (Gray, Macuga, & Regan, 2004). Results of these studies, considered together, suggest that both expansion and bearing information are used in detecting a collision and the efficacy of these information sources may be reduced when objects are present in the scene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previous psychophysical work on TTC judgments reported the involvement of optic flow in tau judgments (Gray et al, 2004, Gray & Regan, 2000), and specifically the importance of global tau for TTP judgments in the absence of local tau information (Kaiser & Mowafy, 1993). A study by Kerzel et al (1999), has contradicted this view by showing that global tau is not needed for TTP judgments when local tau cues are absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Gray and colleagues (2010, 2004, 2000), have reported a strong dependence of time-to-contact (TTC) judgments on self motion-in-depth, suggesting that object motion and self-motion are integrated in the perception of object movement in depth. The discrepancies between these findings and those of Kerzel et al, may be due to differences in the degree of vection experienced by subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several previous studies address a moving observer's ability to judge the trajectory of a moving object or estimate its time-to-contact (Gray, Macuga, & Regan, 2004;Gray & Regan, 2000;Matsuyima & Ando, 2009;Rushton & Warren, 2005;Warren & Rushton, 2008;Warren & Rushton, 2009a;Warren & Rushton, 2009b), few examine how one detects the moving object within the flow field. Two studies have used visual search criteria to examine how quickly people can identify a moving object in a radial flow field (Royden, Wolfe, & Klempen, 2001;Rushton, Bradshaw, & Warren, 2007).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%