1974
DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(74)90032-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long range planning for the small firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These plutons are located within and immediately adjacent to the Maclaren-Kluane schist which is the principal piercing point on the Denali fault (Figure 1). The Maclaren schist and these younger 57 and 52 Ma plutons have been displaced ~480 km from their correlative piercing points (e.g., Forbes et al, 1974;Waldien et al, 2021a). Furthermore, the Mesozoic Clearwater-Nutzotin-Dezeadesh Basin complex has been dissected and slivered with the Clearwater sliver being displaced ~480 km from the Dezeadesh basin and the Nutzotin sequence being displaced ~360 km from Dezeadesh basin (Figure 1) (e.g., Eisbacher, 1976;Lowey et al, 2019;Waldien et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plutons are located within and immediately adjacent to the Maclaren-Kluane schist which is the principal piercing point on the Denali fault (Figure 1). The Maclaren schist and these younger 57 and 52 Ma plutons have been displaced ~480 km from their correlative piercing points (e.g., Forbes et al, 1974;Waldien et al, 2021a). Furthermore, the Mesozoic Clearwater-Nutzotin-Dezeadesh Basin complex has been dissected and slivered with the Clearwater sliver being displaced ~480 km from the Dezeadesh basin and the Nutzotin sequence being displaced ~360 km from Dezeadesh basin (Figure 1) (e.g., Eisbacher, 1976;Lowey et al, 2019;Waldien et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est le cas de Gilmore (1971), pour qui le processus de formulation stratégique en PME peut être mené en six étapes successives (consigner la stratégie effective, identifier les problèmes, découvrir le noyau des problèmes, formuler des alternatives, évaluer les alternatives et, enfin, choisir la nouvelle stratégie). De la même manière, Forbes (1974) décline une proposition en 10 étapes (analyse des frontières de l'activité actuelle, analyse des résultats liés à l'activité, liste des facteurs clés qui influencent l'activité, approximation des évolutions probables des facteurs clés, identification des valeurs des propriétaires et principaux dirigeants, établissement d'objectifs, estimation des forces et faiblesses, mise en place d'un programme d'action, détermination des priorités et estimation de sa propre position). Sans préciser les différentes étapes préconisées, d'autres auteurs ont également proposé leur approche du processus de planification stratégique en PME (Wheelwright, 1971 ;Bracker et Pearson, 1986 ;Scarborough et Zimmerer, 1987 ;Baker, Addams et Davis, 1993).…”
Section: Quelques Modèles De Planificationunclassified
“…Until the late 1970s, the strategic planning literature was marked by a dichotomy between 'top down' and 'bottom up' approaches. Early authors of the 'top down' school had prescribed planning processes developed in large companies as equally suitable for their smaller counterparts (Steiner, 1967;Forbes, 1974). Even in these early days, the empirical research found that systematic planning was a facilitating factor in corporate survival (see Woodruff and Alexander, 1958;Chambers and Golde, 1963) but that its impact on performance (Christensen, 1953;Trow, 1961) was inconclusive.…”
Section: Historical Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%