2018
DOI: 10.4115/jla.2018.10.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long reals

Abstract: The familiar continuum R of real numbers is obtained by a well-known procedure which, starting with the set of natural numbers N = ω , produces in a canonical fashion the field of rationals Q and, then, the field R as the completion of Q under Cauchy sequences (or, equivalently, using Dedekind cuts). In this article, we replace ω by any infinite suitably closed ordinal κ in the above construction and, using the natural (Hessenberg) ordinal operations, we obtain the corresponding field κ-R, which we call the fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 4.2. The version of this theorem where hypothesis (5') is used was also proven independently, in slightly stronger form, by Asperó and Tsaprounis [2], using essentially the same means.…”
Section: Natural Exponentiationmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 4.2. The version of this theorem where hypothesis (5') is used was also proven independently, in slightly stronger form, by Asperó and Tsaprounis [2], using essentially the same means.…”
Section: Natural Exponentiationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We shall prove this in § . (A version of this theorem was also proven independently by Asperó and Tsaprounis around the same time this paper was being written . Their desiderata for natural exponentiation are slightly different, but the method of proof is essentially the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The fact that there is no preferred structure for the range of our generalized metrics implies that every possible generalization‐to‐level‐κ$ \kappa$ of the reals yields an example of G$\mathbb {G}$‐Polish space (as long as this generalization preserves properties like being Cauchy‐complete with respect to its canonical metric over itself). For example, this applies to the long reals introduced by Klaua in [11] and studied by Asperó and Tsaprounis in [2], or to the generalization of R$\mathbb {R}$ introduced in [7] using the surreal numbers. See also [4] for other examples of G$\mathbb {G}$‐Polish spaces, as well as methods to construct Cauchy‐complete totally ordered fields.…”
Section: Polish‐like Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subsequent results, G$\mathbb {G}$ is a totally ordered Abelian group with prefixDegfalse(double-struckGfalse)=κ$\operatorname{Deg}(\mathbb {G})=\kappa$. Examples of groups of this form are double-struckZκ$\mathbb {Z}^\kappa$ and double-struckRκ$\mathbb {R}^\kappa$ (and any other (double-struckG)κ$(\mathbb {G}^{\prime })^\kappa$ for an Abelian group double-struckG$\mathbb {G}^{\prime }$) equipped with coordinate‐wise operations and lexicographic orders, the “κ$\kappa$‐versions of the reals” proposed in [2] or in [7], or any nonstandard model of the reals of degree κ$\kappa$.…”
Section: Polish‐like Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that there is no preferred structure for the range of our generalized metrics implies that every possible generalization-to-level-κ of the reals yields to an example of G-Polish space (as long as this generalization preserves properties like being Cauchy-complete with respect to its canonical metric over itself). For example, this applies to the long reals introduced by Klaua in [Kla60] and studied by Asperó and Tsaprounis in [AT18], or to the generalization of R introduced in [Gal19] using the surreal numbers. See also [DW96] for other examples of G-Polish spaces, as well as methods to construct Cauchy-complete totally ordered fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%