1996
DOI: 10.1101/gr.6.1.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long RT-PCR of the entire 8.5-kb NF1 open reading frame and mutation detection on agarose gels.

Abstract: Previous approaches to mutation detection in mRNA from the neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) locus have required the PCR amplification of five or more overlapping cDNA segments to screen the entire 8.5-kb open reading frame (ORF). Systematically, these assays do not detect deletions that span the region of overlap (usually 1-3 exons) of any two consecutive target segments. In such cases, amplification from the mutant region of the disease-causing allele fails because binding sites for the PCR primers are missing, but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An established effective approach for NF1 variant detection is cDNA‐based screening of lymphocyte RNA (Ars et al, 2000 ; Martinez et al, 1996 ; Messiaen et al, 2000 ; Serra et al, 2001 ; Wimmer et al, 2011 , 2020 ; Zatkova et al, 2004 ). An advantage of this RNA‐first approach is that only one blood sample is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An established effective approach for NF1 variant detection is cDNA‐based screening of lymphocyte RNA (Ars et al, 2000 ; Martinez et al, 1996 ; Messiaen et al, 2000 ; Serra et al, 2001 ; Wimmer et al, 2011 , 2020 ; Zatkova et al, 2004 ). An advantage of this RNA‐first approach is that only one blood sample is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individuals are often referred to as NF1 “no mutation identified” (NMI). In some laboratories, particularly those with a focus on NF1, routine DNA screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) has been complemented or replaced entirely by RNA‐ and next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐ based techniques that increase the diagnostic yield to >95% by identifying variants that affect pre‐mRNA splicing and/or are present at a low frequency due to mosaicism (Ars et al, 2000 ; Evans et al, 2016 ; Koster et al, 2021 ; Martinez et al, 1996 ; Messiaen et al, 2000 ; Serra et al, 2001 ; Wimmer et al, 2011 , 2020 ; Zatkova et al, 2004 ). Unfortunately, such a specialized, focused approach is not available in all diagnostic laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long Range RT-PCR for Native Isoform Identification-A search for native isoforms of the ␣ 1G subunit was further performed using long range RT-PCR (23) and sequence examination of the cDNA fragment covering from nt 2840 (domain II) to nt 6272 (C-terminal region), according to AF126966. The size of this fragment varied from ϳ3.4 to ϳ3.8 kb, as a function of the ␣ 1G isoform detected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to laboratories that specialize in NF1 variant detection and classification using patient RNA [21,39], our diagnostic laboratory performs molecular screening primarily on DNA samples because direct analysis of RNA was not considered practical for routine screening in our setting [18]. The in vitro exon trap experiments provided a useful screen for identifying NF1 variants likely to affect splicing, without having to resample patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%