Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors

Abstract

Abstract. Low-cost sensors are considered to exhibit great potential to complement classical air quality measurements in existing monitoring networks. However, the use of low-cost sensors poses some challenges. In this study, the behavior and performance of electrochemical sensors for NO and NO2 were determined over a longer operating period in a real-world deployment. After careful calibration of the sensors, based on co-location with reference instruments at a rural traffic site during 6 months and by using robust linear regression and random forest regression, the coefficient of determination of both types of sensors was high (R2 > 0.9), and the root mean square error (RMSE) of NO and NO2 sensors was about 6.8 and 3.5 ppb, respectively, for 10 min mean concentrations. The RMSE of the NO2 sensors, however, more than doubled when the sensors were deployed without recalibration for a 1-year period at other site types (including urban background locations), where the range and the variability of air pollutant concentrations differed from the calibration site. This indicates a significant effect of relocation of the sensors on the quality of their data. During deployment, we found that the NO2 sensors are capable of distinguishing general pollution levels, but they proved unsuitable for accurate measurements, mainly due to significant biases. In order to investigate the long-term stability of the original calibration, the sensors were reinstalled at the calibration site after deployment. Surprisingly, the coefficient of determination and the RMSE of the NO sensor remained almost unchanged after more than 1 year of operation. In contrast, the performance of the NO2 sensors clearly deteriorated as indicated by a higher RMSE (about 7.5 ppb, 10 min mean concentrations) and a lower coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.59).

Development of Microclimate Data Recorder on Coffee-Pine Agroforestry Using LoRaWAN and IoT Technology

“…However, for soil moisture and light intensity, the accuracies were 81.23% and 82.56% respectively, denoting good accuracy. This illustrates that while the sensor node exhibits excellent accuracy for air temperature, air humidity, and soil temperature, it shows good accuracy for soil moisture and light intensity, highlighting the effectiveness of the calibration process [80].…”

Low‐cost air quality monitoring networks for long‐term field campaigns: A review

“…Sufficiently long calibration periods should be used, in order to explore a wide range of meteorological conditions and pollutant concentrations. In particular, it is crucial that the calibration period covers all the environmental conditions expected during the operational deployment (Kim et al, 2022; Ratingen et al, 2021; Wei et al, 2020). However, sensor calibration next to reference sites is time consuming (Mueller et al, 2017) and can represent a major obstacle to their widespread deployment (Broday et al, 2017).…”

Long-term Evaluation of Commercial Air Quality Sensors: An Overview from the QUANT Study

“…The mean error bias (MBE) is used to characterise accuracy and precision is quantified by the centered Root Mean Squared Error (cRMSE, e.g. Kim et al (2022) also called unbiased Root Mean Squared Error (uRMSE, e.g. Guimarães et al (2018)).…”