2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2226579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Benefits from Temporary Migration: Does the Gender of the Migrant Matter?

Abstract: Utilizing a nationally representative sample of households from Sri Lanka, this study examines gender differences in the long-term impact of temporary labor migration. We use a propensity score matching (PSM) framework to compare households with return migrants, households with current migrants, and equivalent nonmigrant households in terms of a variety of outcomes. Our results show that households that send women abroad are relatively poor and utilize migration to catch up with the average household, whereas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will enable them to use remittances for investment purposes. The literature related to expenditure patterns of Sri Lankan households highlight the fact that remittances from females are invested in home improvements (renovation and expansion of houses) and acquisition of farm land and nonfarm assets, whereas remittances of men are channelled more toward housing assets and business ventures (De Silva, 2013). Arunatilake et al (2011) highlight that migrant households spend more on food, non-food, durable goods and housing.…”
Section: Migration Gender and Expenditure Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will enable them to use remittances for investment purposes. The literature related to expenditure patterns of Sri Lankan households highlight the fact that remittances from females are invested in home improvements (renovation and expansion of houses) and acquisition of farm land and nonfarm assets, whereas remittances of men are channelled more toward housing assets and business ventures (De Silva, 2013). Arunatilake et al (2011) highlight that migrant households spend more on food, non-food, durable goods and housing.…”
Section: Migration Gender and Expenditure Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also notice that there are no long-term improvements in family well-being due to remittances, as there is a detrimental effect on children left behind when the mother migrates. A study using data from Sri Lanka integrated survey (1999)(2000) and De Silva (2013) found that remittances from females abroad are used for home improvements and acquiring farmland and nonfarm assets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, positive impacts suggest that remittances lead to increase income of the households, whereby the poverty is reduced since the remittances, in most cases, are monetary transfers. Remittances also change the household investment, asset accumulation, children's education and health (De Silva, 2013 and.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%