2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9381-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Changes in Forest Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling Caused by an Introduced Pest/Pathogen Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in litterfall nutrient content following MPB attack most likely reflect limited N resorption prior to senescence [30], [42]. However, while we expected these changes in litterfall quantity and quality to translate to subsequent shifts in N cycling as they reached the forest floor and became available for microbial processing and decomposition [12], [20], the shifts we observed for WbP were relatively subtle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Differences in litterfall nutrient content following MPB attack most likely reflect limited N resorption prior to senescence [30], [42]. However, while we expected these changes in litterfall quantity and quality to translate to subsequent shifts in N cycling as they reached the forest floor and became available for microbial processing and decomposition [12], [20], the shifts we observed for WbP were relatively subtle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast to increased beech dominance at our study site in the Adirondack Mountains, where beech basal area is very high (Morin et al 2005), beech may be replaced by species such as sugar maple or eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) in aftermath forests (including stands in New York state and in western Massachusetts) where beech basal area is lower (Twery and Patterson 1984;Runkle 1990;Lovett et al 2010). In addition to BBD, forest composition (especially sugar maple abundance) in northern hardwood forests can be influenced by factors such as deer browse and sugar maple decline caused by acid deposition (Horsley et al 2000;Duchesne et al 2002;Lovett and Mitchell 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through vigorous competition for light and below-ground resources or due to potential phytotoxic effects of beech leaf leachate . Such changes in forest composition can scale up to ecosystem-level processes by affecting nutrient cycling, litter decomposition, soil pH, exchangeable cations, and soil C:N ratios (Finzi et al 1998;Lovett et al 2010). Beech thickets can also decrease species richness and diversity of understory vegetation (Cale et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research on the role of feedbacks is needed too (Paoletti et al 2007;Garrett et al 2011): not only will climate change affect plant health, but a regionally-toglobally declining plant health may in turn accelerate climate change because of the additional carbon emissions due to increased plant mortality and soil organic matter mineralization, so that plant disease management, by maintaining plant health, has a role in reducing and preventing greenhouse gas emissions (Mahmuti et al 2009;Lovett et al 2010;Busby and Canham 2011; but see Bernier et al 2011). Most importantly, research on climate change and plant health needs to reflect the variety of levels affected and the many viewpoints involved and tools available, from the molecular to the landscape scale, using network theory, meta-and risk analysis, in collaboration with various stakeholders, the publics and scientists outside plant health science.…”
Section: Plant Health and Climate Change: Conclusion And Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%