2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term changes in forest structure and species composition of an upland oak forest in Arkansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of tree mortality cause notable changes in the light and stand thermal conditions which led to structural changes of the shrub layer (Chapman et al 2006) and changes in the soil condition (Thomas, Büttner 1998). Some studies pointed out the negative effect of tree abundance (quantified through basal area or stem density, or directly by light availability) on understorey vegetation cover or diversity (Alaback, Herman 1988;Thomas et al 1999), also supported by the results of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The consequences of tree mortality cause notable changes in the light and stand thermal conditions which led to structural changes of the shrub layer (Chapman et al 2006) and changes in the soil condition (Thomas, Büttner 1998). Some studies pointed out the negative effect of tree abundance (quantified through basal area or stem density, or directly by light availability) on understorey vegetation cover or diversity (Alaback, Herman 1988;Thomas et al 1999), also supported by the results of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Changes in species richness and Evenness index indicated how the community composition had been altered because of environmental changes. Chapman et al (2006) reported that in the upland oak forest of the USA the total shoot density and basal area in the understorey were substantially higher in 2002 than in 1934, increasing from 240 to 688 trees·ha -1 and from 0.9 to 3.6 m 2 ·ha -1 , while the density of most oaks and shortleaf pines in the canopy decreased appreciably over time. Overstorey density and basal area approximately doubled from 1934 to 2002, increasing from 73 to 150 trees·ha -1 and from 7.2 to 14.2 m 2 ·ha -1 , while the black oak density rate decreased in importance from 30.0 to 10.0% (Chapman et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding tree mortality patterns is crucial to understand current forest community composition and to predict changes in stand structure and species composition (Chapman et al, 2006;Heitzman et al, 2007;Galiano et al, 2010;Carnicer et al, 2011;Lechuga et al, 2017). At a regional scale, tree mortality may be mainly influenced by climate, for instance extreme events, such as drought and high temperatures (Anderegg et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of drought are more common visualized at the regional-scale (Keyser & Brown, 2016;Sánchez-Salguero et al, 2017), but its influence on crown dieback and tree death will be modulated at the local-scale, where factors such as topography, soil and stand structure might be as important as regional climate to understand oak forests dynamics (Jenkins & Pallardy, 1995;Chapman et al, 2006;Gea-Izquierdo et al, 2009;Galiano et al, 2010). Topographic characteristics such as slope and aspect also strongly influence soil moisture, and therefore drought-induced tree mortality may vary accordingly (Das et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%