Long-term Clinical Outcomes After TightRope Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Abstract

Background: There is limited information regarding the long-term efficacy of techniques for surgical fixation after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of hook plate (HP) and TightRope (TR) fixation for acute AC joint dislocations by comparing the long-term clinical and radiological patient outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 61 patients with acute AC joint dislocation between July 2011 and November 2015. The patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: HP (n = 36) and TR (n = 25). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score; the Korean Shoulder Score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Side-to-side coracoclavicular (CC) distance on radiographs, postoperative complications, and the rate of subacromial erosion in the HP group were also assessed between procedures. Results: The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 1.0 years, and there were no significant differences in pain or outcome scores between the HP and TR groups (all P > .05). Forward flexion was better in the TR group (172.6° ± 5.6°) versus the HP group (166.0° ± 10.8°; P = .002). The percentages of patients with a difference in the side-to-side CC distance of <5 mm were 83.3% and 72.0% in the HP and TR groups, respectively ( P = .288). Complications were found in 2 patients in the HP group and 1 in the TR group ( P ≥ .999). Subacromial erosion was observed in 41.7% of patients after HP fixation, with no difference in VAS pain scores at the final follow-up in patients with versus without subacromial erosion ( P = .719). Conclusion: When comparing HP with TR fixation for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocations, there were no significant differences in functional outcome scores, final CC distance, or complications. Slightly better forward flexion was seen after TR fixation. Subacromial erosion occurred in 40% of patients after HP fixation, but this did not affect long-term VAS pain scores. Both surgical techniques are effective treatment options for AC joint dislocation.

Efficacy of allogeneic tendon material coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with Kirschner wire and titanium alloy hook plate material fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation

“…More and more scholars have used non-rigid fixation to treat acromioclavicular joint dislocation and achieved good clinical results ( Mardani-Kivi et al, 2013 ; Pérez et al, 2023 ). The rigid fixed structure of the hook plate also makes the shoulder wear the acromion when the shoulder is undergoing abduction exercise rehabilitation, resulting in acromion impingement syndrome ( Ko et al, 2023 ). Or secondary shoulder stiffness and many other complications, so it is usually necessary to remove the hook plate by secondary surgery ( Lin et al, 2014 ; Chang et al, 2019 ).…”

Effect of cigarette smoking on the maintenance of reduction after treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with hook plate fixation

“…Hook plate fixation has been recognized as a straightforward procedure with satisfactory clinical outcomes for treating acute AC joint dislocation [17,29]. Ko et al [30] conducted a long-term outcome comparison between hook plate fixation and the suture button fixation technique. The study did not find significant differences in terms of functional outcome scores, final CCD, or complications between the two treatment groups.…”