Historically, analysis of intragastric exfoliative cytology (IEC) of gastric cancer (GC) was used with a diagnostic intent only. With the successful advent of endoscopic biopsy, the rate of detection of GC has improved worldwide and, as a consequence, IEC has been progressively abandoned. Today, however, there is a renewed interest in this field of research, as witnessed by several pertinent publications. As discussed in this review, in fact, currently the importance of analyzing IEC in patients with early and advanced GC seems to reside in its clinicopathological and prognostic significance. In fact, compared to non-sloughing tumors, GC exhibiting intragastric exfoliation was recently associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype (characterized by deeper infiltration of the gastric wall, lymph nodal or distant metastases, angiolymphatic and perineural invasion) and poorer prognosis. Adoption of IEC examination in routine practice might help identify patients at higher risk of developing local recurrence and peritoneal metastasis from early and advanced GC, optimizing their treatment and improving quality of life and life expectancy.The study of intragastric exfoliative cytology (IEC) of gastric carcinoma (GC) started in 1882 when Rosenbach reported for the first time the presence of tumor cells in the gastric lavage of individuals affected with this type of malignancy (1). Coinciding with the worldwide success and spread of Papanicolaou staining, the heyday of IEC was from the 1940s to the 1960s; since the 1970s, succumbing to the more accurate results in diagnosis provided by the combination of endoscopy with biopsy, it was progressively abandoned (2, 3). Over recent years, however, a renewed interest in IEC has been generated. In 2013, in fact, Xie and colleagues found isolated cancer cells infiltrating the mesogastrium of resected GC specimens; such a finding in the mesogastrium led the authors to identify a metastatic pathway different from the four traditional routes (direct invasion, hematogenous spread, lymphatic dissemination, trancoelomic seeding) and to call it Metastasis V (4, 5). Concomitantly, our and other study groups have decided to focus on and persist in IEC for GC: for the first time in history, however, what was investigated was not the diagnostic role of IEC but other unreported aspects, such as its clinicopathological, prognostic and predictive significance (5-8), as well as prophylactic or therapeutic potential (9, 10). Compared with its non-exfoliative counterpart, in fact, GC exhibiting intraluminal seeding has been associated with traditional aggressive features of malignancy (depth of gastric wall invasion, lymph nodaI and distant metastasis, lymphovascular and perineural emboli) and poorer prognosis (shorter survival and time to tumor progression) (11)(12). Of interest, such results have been confirmed so far for early (13) and advanced (3) GC tumors, as well as GC submitted to neoadjuvant therapy ( 14). For such oncologicaI discoveries and implications, IEC of GC was recently identif...