Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at higher risks but how they should be screened remains uncertain. Hence, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening among patients with NAFLD and family history by different strategies. A hypothetical population of 100,000 subjects aged 40-75 years receive: (i) yearly fecal immunochemical test (FIT) at 50 years; (ii) flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) every 5 years at 50 years; (iii) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years; (iv) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years among those with family history/NAFLD and yearly FIT at 50 years among those without; (v) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 40 years among those with family history/NAFLD and yearly FIT at 50 years among those without and (vi) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 40 years among those with family history/NAFLD and colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years among those without. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was studied by Markov modeling. It was found that colonoscopy, FS and FIT reduced incidence of CRC by 49.5, 26.3 and 23.6%, respectively. Using strategies 4, 5 and 6, the corresponding reduction in CRC incidence was 29.9, 30.9 and 69.3% for family history, and 33.2, 34.7 and 69.8% for NAFLD. Compared with no screening, strategies 4 (US$1,018/life-year saved) and 5 (US$7,485) for family history offered the lowest ICER, whilst strategy 4 (US$5,877) for NAFLD was the most cost-effective. These findings were robust when assessed with a wide range of deterministic sensitivity analyses around the base case. These indicated that screening patients with family history or NAFLD by colonoscopy at 50 years was economically favorable.Colorectal Cancer (CRC) presents a leading global burden of disease, accounting for 10% of all malignancies and 8% of cancer mortality worldwide. 1 Its incidence is rising rapidly in both Western and Asia Pacific countries. 2 Screening was found to be effective in reducing CRC-related mortality by 33, 40 and 56% using fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy, respectively. 3,4 Guidelines from Western and Asian countries 5,6 recommend population-based CRC screening in average-risk subjects aged 50-75 years.Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) and FS are widely used in most countries as primary screening tools. FS is gaining popularity in European countries, whilst colonoscopy is becoming the predominant mode of screening in the United States. 7 None of the screening tests, however, appears optimal across all settings, and it is still inconclusive which of the available options could offer the best balance of costs and benefits.It has been reported that first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with CRC have a twofold increased risk of developing CRC compared to the general population. 8,9 Ng et al. recently found that siblings of CRC patients had a strong and significantly increased risk of advanced neoplasia than siblings of healthy individuals. 10 In addition, Wong et al. reported that patients with nonalcoholic...