2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02714.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term comparison of external valvular stenting and stripping of varicose veins

Abstract: If a valve repair is possible at the saphenofemoral junction, then it should be the preferred treatment option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prospective controlled trial of patients with earlier disease who had cusp preservation showed longterm results at least as good as the ablative procedure. 12,14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prospective controlled trial of patients with earlier disease who had cusp preservation showed longterm results at least as good as the ablative procedure. 12,14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of this communication are to compare the effect of pregnancy on varicose veins and their recurrence compared with a non-pregnant control group. 12 Further to this, to report the incidence of recurrence and reversal of truncal dilatation with stent repair, to define the effect of ovarian vein incompetence and to highlight the differing anatomical distribution of post-pregnant recurrent varicose veins which suggests a physiological form of treatment related to the special reversible effects of pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the conventional external valvuloplasty techniques, the V-OSES operation entails a new and unique approach. We gained extensive experience with the conventional external banding/wrapping techniques, 6,7 as well as the SFJ plication, 8 which are narrowing techniques, thus involving the opposite of the stretching technique. However all of these techniques aim to reduce the vessel area with cusp bundling and implicitly unpredictable erratic or uncertain cusp apposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another group of vein-sparing studies in the literature in which reflux at the saphenofemoral transition was intended to be prevented using different materials such as ESV (external valvular support), the Venocuff, polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, or stents. [17][18][19][20][21] However, when these operations were compared with the Res at operation, they did not fulfill all of the components of the Res at operation. In those operations, the surgical area basically comprised the tube part of the GSV, which is very close to saphenofemoral transition but does not consist of a true transition zone.…”
Section: Augmentation Of the Competent Coaptation (Cc)mentioning
confidence: 99%