2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term consequences of abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet for hemorrhage control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 70% believed direct pressure should be used to manage such bleeding. Some recommended abdominal tourniquets, which are controversial, time-consuming, and not carried by many healthcare providers during a primary triage assessment, although victims’ clothes might be used for such a maneuver [ 48 , 49 ]. To the best of our knowledge, direct pressure is the most feasible intervention in proximal non-compressible injury in a major incident setting [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, only 70% believed direct pressure should be used to manage such bleeding. Some recommended abdominal tourniquets, which are controversial, time-consuming, and not carried by many healthcare providers during a primary triage assessment, although victims’ clothes might be used for such a maneuver [ 48 , 49 ]. To the best of our knowledge, direct pressure is the most feasible intervention in proximal non-compressible injury in a major incident setting [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recommended abdominal tourniquets, which are controversial, time-consuming, and not carried by many healthcare providers during a primary triage assessment, although victims’ clothes might be used for such a maneuver [ 48 , 49 ]. To the best of our knowledge, direct pressure is the most feasible intervention in proximal non-compressible injury in a major incident setting [ 49 ]. Tourniquets on extremities have also been debated for years, with several experts recommending their use while others do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approved mechanical method available for aortic occlusion is the Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT). The AAJT has been demonstrated to be capable of occluding the infrarenal aorta and thus may be effective as an aortic zone 3 occlusion device for control of bleeding below that level such as pelvic hemorrhage 9,21–24 . It achieves this by the mechanical targeting of pressure directly downward towards the abdominal aorta.…”
Section: Aortic Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AAJT has been demonstrated to be capable of occluding the infrarenal aorta and thus may be effective as an aortic zone 3 occlusion device for control of bleeding below that level such as pelvic hemorrhage. 9,[21][22][23][24] It achieves this by the mechanical targeting of pressure directly downward towards the abdominal aorta. This is different from the previously used technologies called the military antishock trousers (MAST) or pneumatic antishock garments (PASG) which have been determined to be ineffective for treating abdominal or pelvic tamponade of severe arterial bleeding and are no longer recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, too broad of a pressurized area and ambiguous vascular locating methods are ubiquitous among existing EHCDs, often resulting in excessive peripheral tissue/organ compression or high compression segments of targeted arteries. The resultant ischemic/mechanical injuries and limb dysfunction obviously inhibit the promotion of EHCDs in clinical practice (8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%