Long-term cycling costs in short-term unit commitment models

Abstract

Cycling of conventional power plants is becoming increasingly important in an electricity system with a large penetration of intermittent renewables. Power plant cycling entails short-term costs, e.g., additional fuel costs during start-up, and long-term costs, e.g., additional maintenance costs. Power plant operators should take long-term cycling costs into account when making short-term scheduling decisions, in order to reduce total generation costs. This paper presents a new approach to consider long-term start-up costs in a short-term unit commitment model. The approach is based on an iterative procedure, in which consecutively a unit commitment model is solved and the correct total start-up cost is recalculated. This new approach, referred to as the Cost Redistribution Unit Commitment (CRUC), is applied to a real-life case study based on the 2014 German electricity system. The performance of the CRUC model, in terms of generation costs and computational tractability, is compared with existing start-up cost formulations in the literature. The simulation results show that, for the considered case study, the CRUC model outperforms the existing formulations in terms of generation costs, but requires a longer run time.Index Terms-Power plant cycling, start-up costs, long-term cycling cost, unit commitment.

A clustering approach to the definition of robust, operational and market efficient delineations for European bidding zones

“…Variating formulations regarding the objective function and set of constraints can be found in [27]. Additional assumptions regarding direct current approximation and detailed methodology for the computation of nodal power transfer distribution factors are developed in [28]. Nonetheless, these formulations can be generalized into generic linear optimisation problem with generation and flow vectors P and f as control and state variables respectively, equality and inequality constraints, and an optimal solution ( P* , f* ).…”

Techno‐economic planning of local energy systems through optimization models: a survey of current methods

“…Since they bring more combinatorial complexity in the optimization problem. UC (Unit Commitment) models illustrate the variety of technological operational features that can be envisaged using linear and discrete MP formulations (see, 60,[63][64][65][66] further discussed in Section 3). In Reference 13, authors also use some accurate modelling features (size dependencies of component efficiencies).…”

Power system flexibility: an overview of emergence to evolution

“…As mentioned above, high penetration of renewable resources would cause conventional units to turn on/off frequently. For base-load units, the raised duty cycle could impose high costs on the components and lead to a marked up forced outage rate, and unit amortization [121,122]. Amortization may extend the repair and maintenance costs, shrink the income because of repeated lasting black-outs, and decrease the efficiency because of low generation.…”

“…In the long-term, fossil fuel and environmental constraints will shift the investments toward low carbon baseload generating units such as nuclear units, geothermal, and carbon capture and sequestration. According to the high minimum generation amount and low ramp capability, these units possess a limited flexibility which will not let them integrate with the network at any time [123]. Consequently, the rate of return for these units would be less and their attractiveness as an investment would disappear.…”