2010
DOI: 10.2172/982224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term desorption behavior of uranium and neptunium in heterogeneous volcanic tuff materials /

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the final pH was lowest in the 0.2 g experiments, it is reasonable that the desorption rate constant would be smallest in the 0.2 g experiments. We note that the trend of less uranium adsorption per unit mass of solids as the solids mass increased in the batch experiments is the opposite of what is expected for a nonlinear adsorption isotherm, which has frequently been observed for uranium on various mineral surfaces (Arnold et al, 2011;Dean, 2010;Davis, 2001;Kohler and Davis, 2001;Kohler et al, 1996;Waite et al, 1994). We attribute this trend to the tendency for uranium to adsorb more strongly at the lower pHs of the experiments with lower solid-to-solution ratios.…”
Section: Batch Sorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Given that the final pH was lowest in the 0.2 g experiments, it is reasonable that the desorption rate constant would be smallest in the 0.2 g experiments. We note that the trend of less uranium adsorption per unit mass of solids as the solids mass increased in the batch experiments is the opposite of what is expected for a nonlinear adsorption isotherm, which has frequently been observed for uranium on various mineral surfaces (Arnold et al, 2011;Dean, 2010;Davis, 2001;Kohler and Davis, 2001;Kohler et al, 1996;Waite et al, 1994). We attribute this trend to the tendency for uranium to adsorb more strongly at the lower pHs of the experiments with lower solid-to-solution ratios.…”
Section: Batch Sorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…This approach to modeling sorption assumes that rates of sorption/desorption between radionuclides and the sorptive medium are orders of magnitude more rapid than the advective groundwater velocity. However, recent studies have shown that desorption rates of U and 237 Np may yield a 3-4 order of magnitude range of desorption rate constants despite uniform flow fields approximating equilibirum conditions (Arnold et al, 2011;Dean, 2010). We recommend from a cost savings perspective that candidate rock masses be screened on the basis of sorption coefficients determined from laboratory batch experiments.…”
Section: Radionuclide Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%